ArticleThe Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma2021
Asthma-COPD overlap in World Trade Center Health Registry enrollees, 2015-2016.
Article in The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- World Trade Center Health Program best practices for diagnosing and treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Archives of environmental & occupational health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAsthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap (ACO) is a newly redefined form of chronic airway disease and has not been well studied among 9/11-exposed populations with increased prevalence of asthma. We assessed the prevalence and risk factors associated with ACO in an exposure cohort of World Trade Center Health Registry (WTCHR) enrollees.
methodsThis is a longitudinal study, including enrollees with complete data on 9/11/01 exposure at enrollment (2003-2004, Wave 1), asthma and COPD diagnoses and at least 25 years of age at the time of the 2015-2016 (Wave 4) WTCHR survey. Probable ACO was defined as self-reported post-9/11 physician-diagnosed asthma and either emphysema, chronic bronchitis, or COPD. We evaluated whether probable ACO was associated with World Trade Center (WTC)-related exposures, using multivariable logistic regression.
resultsOf 36,864 Wave 4 participants, 29,911 were eligible for this analysis, and 1,495 (5.0%) had self-reported post-9/11 probable ACO. After adjusting for demographics and smoking status, we found 38% increased odds of having ACO in enrollees with exposure to the dust cloud, and up to 3.39 times the odds in those with ≥3 injuries sustained on 9/11. Among rescue/recovery workers, ever working on the pile, on the pile on 9/11 or 9/12/01, or working on the WTC site for >7 days showed increased odds ratios of having ACO.
conclusionProbable ACO is associated with WTC exposures. Further study of ACO is needed to understand the development of this and other environmentally or occupationally-related airway diseases, and how to prevent these in disasters like 9/11.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.