Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32930510›Full record

ArticleThoracic cancer2020

Male breast cancer: A closer look at patient and tumor characteristics and factors associated with survival.

Jing Zhao, Bin Wang, Jing Zhao, Yiran Mao, Jun Liu, Yanfang Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jing ZhaoSecond Department of Breast Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Bin WangSecond Department of Breast Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Jing ZhaoDepartment of Ultrasound Diagnosis, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Yiran MaoDepartment of Ultrasound Diagnosis, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Jun LiuSecond Department of Breast Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Yanfang YangSecond Department of Breast Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7097-794X
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81703786National Natural Science Foundation of China 81803004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognostic effect of molecular subtypes on male breast cancer (MBC) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathological and prognostic factors of MBC patients.

methodsFrom 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2014, the data of 152 MBC and 304 female breast cancer (FBC) patients were identified and extensively compared.

resultsCompared with the FBC group, MBC patients were found to have a higher rate of cancer family history (30.9% vs. 18.4%, P = 0.001), mass around the areola area (37.5% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.000), lymph node invasion (44.1% vs. 34.2%, P = 0.006) and hormonal receptor positivity (66.4% vs. 49.3%, P = 0.027). Luminal A was the most common subtype accounting for 69.8%, whereas HER2-positive (12.7%) and TNBC (1.6%) subtypes were rare in the MBC group. However, it was significantly lower for MBC than for FBC who received endocrine therapy (38.8% vs. 49.3%, P = 0.041). MBC showed the worse overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) than those of FBC patients. However, 10-year OS and DFS were similar between MBC and FBC patients in the subgroups of nonluminal subtype (P < 0.001), but worse in MBC patients than those in FBC patients in the subgroups of luminal A (P = 0.004 for OS; P = 0.002 for DFS) and luminal B (P = 0.006 for OS; P = 0.003 for DFS). Multivariate analysis indicated tumor size, radical mastectomy and endocrine therapy as independent risk factors for OS and DFS of MBC patients.

conclusionsOur study determined that MBC patients possessed a worse prognosis, usually with lymph node invasion, and were estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)-negative. Molecular subtypes based on FBC did not provide the same prognostic information in MBC, even in the luminal groups.

Indexed as

AgedBreast Neoplasms, MaleHumansMalePrognosisSurvival AnalysisClinical characteristicmale breast cancerprognosistherapy

Identifiers

PMID32930510
PMCPMC7605988
OpenAlexW3087262604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.