ArticleThoracic cancer2020
Male breast cancer: A closer look at patient and tumor characteristics and factors associated with survival.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Male Breast Cancer: An Analysis of Clinicopathological Features, Treatment Patterns, and Survival Outcomes over 10 Years from a Tertiary Center.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Targeted next-generation sequencing reveals genomic differences between male and female breast cancer.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Predicting Overall Survival in Patients with Male Breast Cancer: Nomogram Development and External Validation Study.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- HER2 expression and pathway status in male breast cancer patients: results of an integrated analysis among 6,150 patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Male Breast Cancer: An Updated Review of Patient Characteristics, Genetics, and Outcome.International journal of breast cancer · 2024Review
- Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of male breast cancer in China.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Identification of a 5-gene-risk score model for predicting luminal A-invasive lobular breast cancer survival.Genetica · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe prognostic effect of molecular subtypes on male breast cancer (MBC) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathological and prognostic factors of MBC patients.
methodsFrom 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2014, the data of 152 MBC and 304 female breast cancer (FBC) patients were identified and extensively compared.
resultsCompared with the FBC group, MBC patients were found to have a higher rate of cancer family history (30.9% vs. 18.4%, P = 0.001), mass around the areola area (37.5% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.000), lymph node invasion (44.1% vs. 34.2%, P = 0.006) and hormonal receptor positivity (66.4% vs. 49.3%, P = 0.027). Luminal A was the most common subtype accounting for 69.8%, whereas HER2-positive (12.7%) and TNBC (1.6%) subtypes were rare in the MBC group. However, it was significantly lower for MBC than for FBC who received endocrine therapy (38.8% vs. 49.3%, P = 0.041). MBC showed the worse overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) than those of FBC patients. However, 10-year OS and DFS were similar between MBC and FBC patients in the subgroups of nonluminal subtype (P < 0.001), but worse in MBC patients than those in FBC patients in the subgroups of luminal A (P = 0.004 for OS; P = 0.002 for DFS) and luminal B (P = 0.006 for OS; P = 0.003 for DFS). Multivariate analysis indicated tumor size, radical mastectomy and endocrine therapy as independent risk factors for OS and DFS of MBC patients.
conclusionsOur study determined that MBC patients possessed a worse prognosis, usually with lymph node invasion, and were estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)-negative. Molecular subtypes based on FBC did not provide the same prognostic information in MBC, even in the luminal groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.