Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32930391›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2020

Rapid Integration of Home Telehealth Visits Amidst COVID-19: What Do Older Adults Need to Succeed?

Chelsea E Hawley, Nicole Genovese, Montgomery T Owsiany, Laura K Triantafylidis, Lauren R Moo, Amy M Linsky, Jennifer L Sullivan, Julie M Paik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Technology access and preferences for remote assessments at Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Training Service Users in the Use of Telehealth: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chelsea E HawleyNew England Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6136-8189
Nicole GenoveseDepartment of Pharmacy, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Montgomery T OwsianyNew England Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Laura K TriantafylidisDepartment of Pharmacy, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lauren R MooNew England Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Bedford VA Medical Center, Bedford, Massachusetts, USA.
Amy M LinskyCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jennifer L SullivanCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2906-2232
Julie M PaikNew England Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Intramural VA VA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur objective was to identify and address patient-perceived barriers to integrating home telehealth visits.

designWe used an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design to conduct patient needs assessments, a home telehealth pilot, and formative evaluation of the pilot.

settingVeterans Affairs geriatrics-renal clinic.

participantsPatients with scheduled clinic visits from October 2019 to April 2020. MEASUREMENTS: We conducted an in-person needs assessment and telephone postvisit interviews.

resultsThrough 50 needs assessments, we identified patient-perceived barriers in interest, access to care, access to technology, and confidence. A total of 34 (68%) patients were interested in completing a home telehealth visit, but fewer (32 (64%)) had access to the necessary technology or were confident (21 (42%)) that they could participate. We categorized patients into four phenotypes based on their interest and capability to complete a home telehealth visit: interested and capable, interested and incapable, uninterested and capable, and uninterested and incapable. These phenotypes allowed us to create trainings to overcome patient-perceived barriers. We completed 32 home telehealth visits and 12 postvisit interviews. Our formative evaluation showed that our pilot was successful in addressing many patient-perceived barriers. All interviewees reported that the home telehealth visits improved their well-being. Home telehealth visits saved participants an average of 166 minutes of commute time. Five participants borrowed a device from a family member, and five visits were finished via telephone. All participants successfully completed a home telehealth visit.

conclusionsWe identified patient-perceived barriers to home telehealth visits and classified patients into four phenotypes based on these barriers. Using principles of implementation science, our home telehealth pilot addressed these barriers, and all patients successfully completed a visit. Future study is needed to understand methods to deploy larger-scale efforts to integrate home telehealth visits into the care of older adults.

Indexed as

House CallsTelemedicineAgedCOVID-19GeriatricsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicMassachusettsNeeds AssessmentPandemicsPilot ProjectsVeteransCOVID-19geriatricshome telehealthtelehealthvirtual care

Identifiers

PMID32930391
PMCPMC8554768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.