Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32930152›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020

A Novel Multiple-Cue Observational Clinical Scale for Functional Evaluation of Gait After Stroke - The Stroke Mobility Score (SMS).

Dominik Raab, Brigitta Diószeghy-Léránt, Meret Wünnemann, Christina Zumfelde, Elena Cramer, Alina Rühlemann, Johanna Wagener, Silke Gegenbauer, Francisco Geu Flores, Marcus Jäger and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation of the Wisconsin Gait Scale in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis and Spastic Hemiplegia.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  2. AN INTELLIGIBLE AI-DRIVEN DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR POSTSTROKE MOBILITY ASSESSMENT.Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications · 2025
    Article
  3. [Clinical value of instrumental gait analysis].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Dominik RaabChair of Mechanics and Robotics, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
Brigitta Diószeghy-LérántNeurology Rehabilitation Unit, MediClin Fachklinik Rhein/Ruhr, Essen, Germany.
Meret WünnemannNeurology Rehabilitation Unit, MediClin Fachklinik Rhein/Ruhr, Essen, Germany.
Christina ZumfeldeNeurology Rehabilitation Unit, MediClin Fachklinik Rhein/Ruhr, Essen, Germany.
Elena CramerDepartment of Applied Health Sciences - Physiotherapy, University of Applied Sciences Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Alina RühlemannDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Johanna WagenerDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Silke GegenbauerITBB GmbH, Neukirchen-Vluyn, Germany.
Francisco Geu FloresChair of Mechanics and Robotics, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
Marcus JägerDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Dörte ZietzDepartment of Applied Health Sciences - Physiotherapy, University of Applied Sciences Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Harald HefterDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Andres KecskemethyChair of Mechanics and Robotics, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
Mario SieblerNeurology Rehabilitation Unit, MediClin Fachklinik Rhein/Ruhr, Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND For future development of machine learning tools for gait impairment assessment after stroke, simple observational whole-body clinical scales are required. Current observational scales regard either only leg movement or discrete overall parameters, neglecting dysfunctions in the trunk and arms. The purpose of this study was to introduce a new multiple-cue observational scale, called the stroke mobility score (SMS). MATERIAL AND METHODS In a group of 131 patients, we developed a 1-page manual involving 6 subscores by Delphi method using the video-based SMS: trunk posture, leg movement of the most affected side, arm movement of the most affected side, walking speed, gait fluency and stability/risk of falling. Six medical raters then validated the SMS on a sample of 60 additional stroke patients. Conventional scales (NIHSS, Timed-Up-And-Go-Test, 10-Meter-Walk-Test, Berg Balance Scale, FIM-Item L, Barthel Index) were also applied. RESULTS (1) High consistency and excellent inter-rater reliability of the SMS were verified (Cronbach's alpha >0.9). (2) The SMS subscores are non-redundant and reveal much more nuanced whole-body dysfunction details than conventional scores, although evident correlations as e.g. between 10-Meter-Walk-Test and subscore "gait speed" are verified. (3) The analysis of cross-correlations between SMS subscores unveils new functional interrelationships for stroke profiling. CONCLUSIONS The SMS proves to be an easy-to-use, tele-applicable, robust, consistent, reliable, and nuanced functional scale of gait impairments after stroke. Due to its sensitivity to whole-body motion criteria, it is ideally suited for machine learning algorithms and for development of new therapy strategies based on instrumented gait analysis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisability EvaluationFemaleGait AnalysisGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansMaleMiddle AgedStrokeVideo RecordingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32930152
PMCPMC7518021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.