Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32929977›Full record

Observational studyThe Annals of pharmacotherapy2021

Development of Machine Learning Models to Validate a Medication Regimen Complexity Scoring Tool for Critically Ill Patients.

Mohammad A Al-Mamun, Todd Brothers, Andrea Sikora Newsome

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A descriptive report of the rapid implementation of automated MRC-ICU calculations in the EMR of an academic medical center.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2022
    Article
  17. Medication regimen complexity vs patient acuity for predicting critical care pharmacist interventions.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2022
    Observational
  18. Optimization of critical care pharmacy clinical services: A gap analysis approach.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammad A Al-MamunUniversity of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA.
Todd BrothersUniversity of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1799-7233
Andrea Sikora NewsomeThe University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Augusta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2020-0571

Funding

Implementing a Maternal health and PRegnancy Outcomes Vision for Everyone (IMPROVE)UL1TR002378 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Andres J Garcia, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2017 to 2026
$92.1M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002381 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HENRY M BLUMBERG, Anandi Nayan Sheth · 2017 to 2026
$14.1M
Neuro HPA Project 1U54AG062334 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Ighovwerha Ofotokun · 2018 to 2026
$12.2M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002381NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002378NIA NIH HHS U54 AG062334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Medication Regimen Complexity -Intensive Care Unit (MRC-ICU) is the first tool for measuring medication regimen complexity in critically ill patients. This study tested machine learning (ML) models to investigate the relationship between medication regimen complexity and patient outcomes.

methodsThis study was a single-center, retrospective observational evaluation of 130 adults admitted to the medical ICU. The MRC-ICU score was utilized to improve the inpatient model's prediction accuracy. Three models were proposed: model I, demographic data without medication data; model II, demographic data and medication regimen complexity variables; and model III: demographic data and the MRC-ICU score. A total of 6 ML classifiers was developed: k-nearest neighbor (KNN), naïve Bayes (NB), random forest, support vector machine, neural network, and logistic classifier (LC). They were developed and tested using electronic health record data to predict inpatient mortality.

resultsThe results demonstrated that adding medication regimen complexity variables (model II) and the MRC-ICU score (model III) improved inpatient mortality prediction.. The LC outperformed the other classifiers (KNN and NB), with an overall accuracy of 83%, sensitivity (Se) of 87%, specificity of 67%, positive predictive value of 93%, and negative predictive value of 46%. The APACHE III score and the MRC-ICU score at the 24-hour interval were the 2 most important variables. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Inclusion of the MRC-ICU score improved the prediction of patient outcomes on the previously established APACHE III score. This novel, proof-of-concept methodology shows promise for future application of the MRC-ICU scoring tool for patient outcome predictions.

Indexed as

APACHEAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBayes TheoremCritical IllnessFemaleHospitalizationHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsMachine LearningMaleMedication ReconciliationMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesadministrationclinical pharmacyclinical practicecritical caremedical informatics

Identifiers

PMID32929977
PMCPMC8106768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.