ArticleEuropean radiology2021
The effect of coronary calcification on diagnostic performance of machine learning-based CT-FFR: a Chinese multicenter study.
Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- A meta-analysis comparing the diagnostic performance of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve and coronary computed tomography angiography at different levels of coronary artery calcium score.European radiology · 2024Pooled it
- Agreement of Fractional Flow Reserve Estimated by Computed Tomography With Invasively Measured Fractional Flow Reserve: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of CT-derived fractional flow reserve across coronary lesion morphologies: a prospective multicenter study.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Comparison of systolic and diastolic CT-FFR for myocardial ischemia diagnosis.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Hypersensitive detection of single millimeter vascular emboli from adhesive in vivo.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Long-term prognostic value of the CT-derived fractional flow reserve combined with atherosclerotic burden in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease.European radiology · 2025Article
- Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: A Comprehensive Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Two birds with one stone: pre-TAVI coronary CT angiography combined with FFR helps screen for coronary stenosis.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Prognostic Significance of Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve for Long-Term Outcomes in Individuals With Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence based fractional flow reserve.Cardiology journal · 2025Review
- The diagnostic performance of machine learning-based FFRCT for coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Article
- Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: Developing A Gold Standard for Coronary Artery Disease Diagnostics.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- The differences between patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and those without NAFLD, as well as predictors of functional coronary artery ischemia in patients with NAFLD.Clinical cardiology · 2024Article
- Impact of calcification on Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio for physiological assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses.Cardiology journal · 2024Article
- Article
- Science mapping analysis of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reverse: a bibliometric review from 2012 to 2022.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- The incremental value of CCTA-derived myocardial radiomics signature for ischemia diagnosis with reference to CT myocardial perfusion imaging.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- ECG-based cardiodynamicsgram can reflect anomalous functional information in coronary artery disease.Clinical cardiology · 2023Article
- Validation of hemodynamic stress calculation in coronary computed tomography angiography versus intravascular ultrasound.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography derived fractional flow reserve (CTFFR) in patients with coronary artery calcification: insights from multi-center experiments in China.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the effect of coronary calcification morphology and severity on the diagnostic performance of machine learning (ML)-based coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) with FFR as a reference standard.
methodsA total of 442 patients (61.2 ± 9.1 years, 70% men) with 544 vessels who underwent CCTA, ML-based CT-FFR, and invasive FFR from China multicenter CT-FFR study were enrolled. The effect of calcification arc, calcification remodeling index (CRI), and Agatston score (AS) on the diagnostic performance of CT-FFR was investigated. CT-FFR ≤ 0.80 and lumen reduction ≥ 50% determined by CCTA were identified as vessel-specific ischemia with invasive FFR as a reference standard.
resultsCompared with invasive FFR, ML-based CT-FFR yielded an overall sensitivity of 0.84, specificity of 0.94, and accuracy of 0.90 in a total of 344 calcification lesions. There was no statistical difference in diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, or specificity of CT-FFR across different calcification arc, CRI, or AS levels. CT-FFR exhibited improved discrimination of ischemia compared with CCTA alone in lesions with mild-to-moderate calcification (AUC, 0.89 vs. 0.69, p < 0.001) and lesions with CRI ≥ 1 (AUC, 0.89 vs. 0.71, p < 0.001). The diagnostic accuracy and specificity of CT-FFR were higher than CCTA alone in patients and vessels with mid (100 to 299) or high (≥ 300) AS.
conclusionCoronary calcification morphology and severity did not influence diagnostic performance of CT-FFR in ischemia detection, and CT-FFR showed marked improved discrimination of ischemia compared with CCTA alone in the setting of calcification. KEY POINTS: • CT-FFR provides superior diagnostic performance than CCTA alone regardless of coronary calcification. • No significant differences in the diagnostic performance of CT-FFR were observed in coronary arteries with different coronary calcification arcs and calcified remodeling indexes. • No significant differences in the diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR were observed in coronary arteries with different coronary calcification score levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.