Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32929237›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2021

Intrafamilial communication of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic information in Italian women: towards a personalised approach.

Maria Luisa Di Pietro, Drieda Zaçe, Alessia Orfino, Francesca Romana Di Raimo, Andrea Poscia, Elisabetta de Matteis, Daniela Turchetti, Lea Godino, Benedetta Bertonazzi, Marzena Franiuk and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Luisa Di PietroSezione di Igiene, Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Drieda ZaçeSezione di Igiene, Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy. drieda.zace@unicatt.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3623-6800
Alessia OrfinoFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Francesca Romana Di RaimoUOC Genetica Medica, Dipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio e Infettivologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Andrea PosciaUOC ISP Prevention and Surveillance of Infectious and Chronic Diseases-Department of Prevention-Local Health Authority (ASUR-AV2), Jesi, Italy.
Elisabetta de MatteisOncology Unit, "Vito Fazzi" Hospital, Lecce, Italy.
Daniela TurchettiU.O. Genetica Medica, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6792-3921
Lea GodinoU.O. Genetica Medica, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3763-9372
Benedetta BertonazziU.O. Genetica Medica, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
Marzena FraniukHereditary Cancer Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Carla BruzzoneHereditary Cancer Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Liliana VarescoHereditary Cancer Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4871-6668
Emanuela Lucci-CordiscoUOC Genetica Medica, Dipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio e Infettivologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Maurizio GenuardiUOC Genetica Medica, Dipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio e Infettivologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7410-8351
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITIRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITAzienda Sanitaria Locale Roma 3 · ITOspedale Vito Fazzi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic testing expansion is accompanied by an increasing need for genetic counselling and intrafamilial communication. Genetic counselling can play an important role in facilitating intrafamilial communication and relationships. We conducted a cross-sectional, multicenter study including 252 Italian women, using a questionnaire divided in two sections, the first one to be filled after the pre-test counselling and the second after receiving BRCA test results. We assessed the factors influencing intrafamilial disclosure of genetic information for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, family members with whom probands are more prone to share genetic information, and the perceived understanding of information received by counselees during genetic counselling. Women were accompanied to the counselling more often by their husband/partner. Among those with a positive BRCA test result, 49% intended to communicate it to their offspring and 27% to their husband/partner. Younger women, those living with their husband/partner, and those who described family communication as open/profound and spontaneous/sincere had a higher probability of being accompanied during genetic counselling and discuss about it with relatives. Spontaneous/sincere or open/profound family communication and joyful/happy familial relationships were associated with the decision to undergo genetic testing as a responsibility towards relatives. Women had a good understanding of counselling contents (mean score 9.27 in a scale 1-10). Genetic counselling providers should consider that genetic information disclosure does not depend only on the clarity of the information provided, but also on pre-existing intrafamilial communication and relationships, family structure and marital status, indicating the need for a personalised approach accounting for these factors.

Indexed as

CommunicationGenetic CounselingAdultBreast NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesDisclosureFamilyFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansItalyMiddle AgedOvarian Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID32929237
PMCPMC7868365
OpenAlexW3085377288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.