Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32929206›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2021

Proteome specialization of anaerobic fungi during ruminal degradation of recalcitrant plant fiber.

Live H Hagen, Charles G Brooke, Claire A Shaw, Angela D Norbeck, Hailan Piao, Magnus Ø Arntzen, Heather M Olson, Alex Copeland, Nancy Isern, Anil Shukla and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Diversity and community structure of anaerobic gut fungi in camels.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Live H HagenFaculty of Biotechnology, Chemistry and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Aas, Norway. live.hagen@nmbu.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2606-5331
Charles G BrookeUniversity of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Claire A ShawUniversity of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Angela D NorbeckPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Hailan PiaoWashington State University, Richland, WA, USA.
Magnus Ø ArntzenFaculty of Biotechnology, Chemistry and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Aas, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1803-727X
Heather M OlsonEnvironmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4501-9587
Alex CopelandU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3971-5439
Nancy IsernEnvironmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, CA, USA.
Anil ShuklaPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Simon RouxU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Vincent LombardCNRS, UMR 7257, Université Aix-Marseille, 13288, Marseille, France.
Bernard HenrissatCNRS, UMR 7257, Université Aix-Marseille, 13288, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3434-8588
Michelle A O'MalleyDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6065-8491
Igor V GrigorievU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3136-8903
Susannah G TringeU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6479-8427
Roderick I MackieDepartment of Animal Science, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.
Ljiljana Pasa-TolicEnvironmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9853-5457
Phillip B PopeFaculty of Biotechnology, Chemistry and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Aas, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2067-4059
Matthias HessUniversity of California, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0321-0380
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USNorwegian University of Life Sciences · NOUniversity of California, Davis · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USWashington State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rumen harbors a complex microbial mixture of archaea, bacteria, protozoa, and fungi that efficiently breakdown plant biomass and its complex dietary carbohydrates into soluble sugars that can be fermented and subsequently converted into metabolites and nutrients utilized by the host animal. While rumen bacterial populations have been well documented, only a fraction of the rumen eukarya are taxonomically and functionally characterized, despite the recognition that they contribute to the cellulolytic phenotype of the rumen microbiota. To investigate how anaerobic fungi actively engage in digestion of recalcitrant fiber that is resistant to degradation, we resolved genome-centric metaproteome and metatranscriptome datasets generated from switchgrass samples incubated for 48 h in nylon bags within the rumen of cannulated dairy cows. Across a gene catalog covering anaerobic rumen bacteria, fungi and viruses, a significant portion of the detected proteins originated from fungal populations. Intriguingly, the carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZyme) profile suggested a domain-specific functional specialization, with bacterial populations primarily engaged in the degradation of hemicelluloses, whereas fungi were inferred to target recalcitrant cellulose structures via the detection of a number of endo- and exo-acting enzymes belonging to the glycoside hydrolase (GH) family 5, 6, 8, and 48. Notably, members of the GH48 family were amongst the highest abundant CAZymes and detected representatives from this family also included dockerin domains that are associated with fungal cellulosomes. A eukaryote-selected metatranscriptome further reinforced the contribution of uncultured fungi in the ruminal degradation of recalcitrant fibers. These findings elucidate the intricate networks of in situ recalcitrant fiber deconstruction, and importantly, suggest that the anaerobic rumen fungi contribute a specific set of CAZymes that complement the enzyme repertoire provided by the specialized plant cell wall degrading rumen bacteria.

Indexed as

ProteomeAnaerobiosisAnimalsCattleFemaleFungiGlycoside HydrolasesRumenGlycoside HydrolasesProteome

Identifiers

PMID32929206
PMCPMC8026616
OpenAlexW3086289414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.