ArticleNature human behaviour2020
A unified account of numerosity perception.
Article in Nature human behaviour, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantity Estimation by Repeated Comparative Judgments.Cognitive science · 2026Article
- Endogenous precision of the number sense.eLife · 2026Article
- The "Crowd Size Illusion" and the Relativity of Number Perception.Cognitive science · 2025Article
- Article
- Bayesian estimation yields anti-Weber variability.PNAS nexus · 2025Article
- Symmetrical and asymmetrical distortions in time and numerosity perception induced by chunked stimuli.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Efficient numerosity estimation under limited time.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Are three zebras more than three frogs: examining conceptual and physical congruency in numerosity judgements of familiar objects.Psychological research · 2024Article
- Approximate planning in spatial search.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- A number sense as an emergent property of the manipulating brain.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Linguacultural and Cognitive Peculiarities of Linguistic Universals.Journal of psycholinguistic research · 2024Article
- Introducing Mr. Three: Attention, Perception, and Meaning Selection in the Acquisition of Number and Color Words.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2024Article
- Distinct neuronal representation of small and large numbers in the human medial temporal lobe.Nature human behaviour · 2023Article
- Human acute microelectrode array recordings with broad cortical access, single-unit resolution, and parallel behavioral monitoring.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Multimodality matters in numerical communication.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Review
- The cultural origins of symbolic number.Psychological review · 2022Article
- Visual field asymmetries in numerosity processing.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022Article
- Efficient coding of numbers explains decision bias and noise.Nature human behaviour · 2022Article
- Prior Expectations in Visual Speed Perception Predict Encoding Characteristics of Neurons in Area MT.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- Asymmetric reinforcement learning facilitates human inference of transitive relations.Nature human behaviour · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
People can identify the number of objects in sets of four or fewer items with near-perfect accuracy but exhibit linearly increasing error for larger sets. Some researchers have taken this discontinuity as evidence of two distinct representational systems. Here, we present a mathematical derivation showing that this behaviour is an optimal representation of cardinalities under a limited informational capacity, indicating that this behaviour can emerge from a single system. Our derivation predicts how the amount of information accessible to viewers should influence the perception of quantity for both large and small sets. In a series of four preregistered experiments (N = 100 each), we varied the amount of information accessible to participants in number estimation. We find tight alignment between the model and human performance for both small and large quantities, implicating efficient representation as the common origin behind key phenomena of human and animal numerical cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32929205What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.