Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32929015›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Exploring the landscape of model representations.

Thomas T Foley, Katherine M Kidder, M Scott Shell, W G Noid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bridging Scales: Coarse-Grained Protein Models in Computational Biology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Bottom-up Coarse-Grained Models of Asymmetric Membranes.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Top-Down Machine Learning of Coarse-Grained Protein Force Fields.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Article
  7. OpenMSCG: A Software Tool for Bottom-Up Coarse-Graining.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Bottom-up Coarse-Graining: Principles and Perspectives.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Model behaviour.Nature materials · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas T FoleyDepartment of Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.ORCID 0000-0002-6878-5292
Katherine M KidderDepartment of Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.ORCID 0000-0002-6430-4746
M Scott ShellDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 wnoid@chem.psu.edu shell@engineering.ucsb.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0439-1534
W G NoidDepartment of Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; wnoid@chem.psu.edu shell@engineering.ucsb.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9675-8489

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of any physical model critically depends upon adopting an appropriate representation for the phenomenon of interest. Unfortunately, it remains generally challenging to identify the essential degrees of freedom or, equivalently, the proper order parameters for describing complex phenomena. Here we develop a statistical physics framework for exploring and quantitatively characterizing the space of order parameters for representing physical systems. Specifically, we examine the space of low-resolution representations that correspond to particle-based coarse-grained (CG) models for a simple microscopic model of protein fluctuations. We employ Monte Carlo (MC) methods to sample this space and determine the density of states for CG representations as a function of their ability to preserve the configurational information, I, and large-scale fluctuations, Q, of the microscopic model. These two metrics are uncorrelated in high-resolution representations but become anticorrelated at lower resolutions. Moreover, our MC simulations suggest an emergent length scale for coarse-graining proteins, as well as a qualitative distinction between good and bad representations of proteins. Finally, we relate our work to recent approaches for clustering graphs and detecting communities in networks.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalProtein ConformationMonte Carlo MethodNeural Networks, ComputerPhase Transitionentropyinformation theorymultiscale modelingnetworksproteins

Identifiers

PMID32929015
PMCPMC7533877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.