Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32928855›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Recurrence of cervical artery dissection: protocol for a systematic review.

Elizabeth Lounsbury, Brian Dewar, Alexandra Davis, Dean A Fergusson, Dar Dowlatshahi, Michel Shamy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recurrence of cervical artery dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth LounsburyNeurology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada elounsbury@toh.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-6238-6047
Brian DewarNeuroscience, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Alexandra DavisLibrary Services, Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Dean A FergussonMedicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Dar DowlatshahiNeurology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Michel ShamyNeurology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ottawa Hospital · CARoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCervical artery dissection, including carotid and vertebral artery dissection, is an important cause of stroke in the young. Risk of developing cervical artery dissection has been associated with physical activity in various forms and has been presumed to be related to minor trauma and mechanical stretching of the cervical arteries. This systematic review will aim to synthesise data on the risk of recurrent cervical artery dissection after an initial dissection. This information may be applied to further understand the natural history of this disease, and potentially to help direct evidence-based discussions on safe return to activity after dissection. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A broad search of multiple electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science) will be conducted to identify studies published as of 13 November 2019, examining all-comers with cervical artery dissection observed over time. Studies will be screened by two independent reviewers in a two-level process to determine eligibility for inclusion. Data will be pooled from eligible articles and the main outcome of recurrent cervical artery dissection at 5 years will be determined using quantitative analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not necessary as no primary data are being collected. The information will be disseminated in the form of a systematic review article which will be submitted to a peer-reviewed medical journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020166105.

Indexed as

StrokeCarotid ArteriesDissectionHumansRecurrenceSystematic Reviews as Topicneurologystrokestroke medicine

Identifiers

PMID32928855
PMCPMC7488837
OpenAlexW3086269642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.