Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32928780›Full record

ReviewBMJ health & care informatics2020

Use of eHealth in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension: review of the literature.

Manuel C Gonzalez-Garcia, Farhad Fatehi, Marlien Varnfield, Hang Ding, Mohan Karunanithi, Ian Yang, Rachael Cordina, John Feenstra

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ health & care informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Management of pulmonary hypertension in special conditions.The European respiratory journal · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Sendaway capillary NT-proBNP in pulmonary hypertension.BMJ open respiratory research · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Manuel C Gonzalez-GarciaDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Farhad FatehiCentre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia ffatehi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9888-1966
Marlien VarnfieldAustralian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Hang DingAustralian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Mohan KarunanithiAustralian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Ian YangDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia.
Rachael CordinaDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
John FeenstraQueensland Lung Transplant Service, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUThe University of Queensland · AUPrince Charles Hospital · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a severe chronic condition associated with poor quality of life and high risks of mortality and hospitalisation. The utilisation of novel diagnostic technologies has improved survival rates although the effectiveness of Electronic Health (eHealth) interventions in patients with a chronic cardiopulmonary disease remains controversial. As the effectiveness of eHealth can be established by specific evaluation for different chronic health conditions, the aim of this study was to explore and summarise the utilisation of eHealth in PAH.

methodWe searched PubMed, CINAHL and Embase for all studies reporting clinical trials on eHealth solutions for the management of PAH. No limitations in terms of study design or date of publication were imposed.

results18 studies (6 peer-reviewed journal papers and 12 conference papers) were identified. Seven studies addressed the accuracy, safety or reliability of eHealth technologies such as intra-arterial haemodynamic monitoring of the pulmonary artery pressure, self-administered 6-Minute walk test App, computerised step-pulse oximeter and ambulatory impedance cardiography. Two studies evaluated eHealth as part of the medical management and showed a reduction in hospitalisation rate.

conclusionsThe evidence of eHealth supporting the management of people with PAH is limited and only embraced through a few studies of small sample size and short-term duration. Given the proposed clinical benefits in heart failure, we postulate that the evaluation of eHealth for the clinical management of PAH is highly warranted.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementTelemedicineChronic DiseaseHumansPulmonary Arterial Hypertensionhealth carepatient care

Identifiers

PMID32928780
PMCPMC7490940
OpenAlexW3084550605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.