Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32928748›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2021

Bacterial infections as novel risk factors of severe diabetic retinopathy in individuals with type 1 diabetes.

Johan Rasmus Simonsen, Asko Järvinen, Kustaa Hietala, Valma Harjutsalo, Carol Forsblom, Per-Henrik Groop, Markku Lehto

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Diabetic retinal disease.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Virulence · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Johan Rasmus SimonsenFolkhälsan Research Center, Folkhälsan Institute of Genetics, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1956-4423
Asko JärvinenDivision of Infectious Diseases, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Kustaa HietalaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyvaskyla, Finland.
Valma HarjutsaloFolkhälsan Research Center, Folkhälsan Institute of Genetics, Helsinki, Finland.
Carol ForsblomFolkhälsan Research Center, Folkhälsan Institute of Genetics, Helsinki, Finland.
Per-Henrik GroopResearch Program for Clinical and Molecular Metabolism, University of Helsinki Faculty of Medicine, Helsinki, Finland per-henrik.groop@helsinki.fi.
Markku LehtoFolkhälsan Research Center, Folkhälsan Institute of Genetics, Helsinki, Finland.
Helsinki University Hospital · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FICentral Finland Health Care District · FIFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsDiabetic retinopathy (DR) is associated and shares many risk factors with other diabetic complications, including inflammation. Bacterial infections, potent inducers of inflammation have been associated with the development of diabetic complications apart from DR. Our aim was to investigate the association between bacterial infections and DR.

methodsAdult individuals with type 1 diabetes (n=1043) were recruited from the Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy Study (FinnDiane), a prospective follow-up study. DR was defined as incident severe diabetic retinopathy (SDR), identified as first laser treatment. Data on DR were obtained through fundus photographs and medical records, data on bacterial infections from comprehensive national registries (1 January 1995 to 31 December 2015). Risk factors for DR and serum bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) activity were determined at baseline.

resultsIndividuals with incident SDR (n=413) had a higher mean number of antibiotic purchases/follow-up year compared with individuals without incident SDR (n=630) (0.92 [95% CI 0.82 to 1.02] vs 0.67 [0.62-0.73], p=0.02), as well as higher levels of LPS activity (0.61 [0.58-0.65] vs 0.56 [0.54-0.59] EU/mL, p=0.03). Individuals with on average ≥1 purchase per follow-up year (n=269) had 1.5 times higher cumulative incidence of SDR, compared with individuals with <1 purchase (n=774) per follow-up year (52% vs 35%, p<0.001). In multivariable Cox survival models, the mean number of antibiotic purchases per follow-up year as well as LPS activity were risk factors for SDR after adjusting for static confounders (HR 1.16 [1.05-1.27], p=0.002 and HR 2.77 [1.92-3.99], p<0.001, respectively).

conclusionBacterial infections are associated with an increased risk of incident SDR in type 1 diabetes.

Indexed as

AdultDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetic RetinopathyEye Infections, BacterialFemaleHumansLipopolysaccharidesMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsYoung AdultLipopolysaccharidesEpidemiologyInfectionInflammationTreatment Lasers

Identifiers

PMID32928748
PMCPMC8311102
OpenAlexW3086317295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.