Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32928493›Full record

ArticleVeterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2020

Effectiveness of two intranasal vaccines for the control of bovine respiratory disease in newborn beef calves: A randomized non-inferiority multicentre field trial.

N Masset, F Meurens, M Marie, P Lesage, A Lehébel, N Brisseau, S Assié

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Welfare of calves.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

N MassetINRAE, Oniris, BIOEPAR, 44300 Nantes, France; SELAS EVA, Réseau Cristal, 16 Avenue du Général De Gaulle, 79150 Argentonnay, France. Electronic address: nicolas.masset@oniris-nantes.fr.
F MeurensINRAE, Oniris, BIOEPAR, 44300 Nantes, France.
M MarieINRAE, Oniris, BIOEPAR, 44300 Nantes, France; SELAS EVA, Réseau Cristal, 16 Avenue du Général De Gaulle, 79150 Argentonnay, France.
P LesageINRAE, Oniris, BIOEPAR, 44300 Nantes, France; SELAS EVA, Réseau Cristal, 16 Avenue du Général De Gaulle, 79150 Argentonnay, France.
A LehébelINRAE, Oniris, BIOEPAR, 44300 Nantes, France.
N BrisseauINRAE, Oniris, BIOEPAR, 44300 Nantes, France.
S AssiéINRAE, Oniris, BIOEPAR, 44300 Nantes, France.
Biologie Epidémiologie et Analyse de Risque en santé animaleLaboratoire de Génie des Procédés – Environnement – Agro-alimentaire · FROniris · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) and bovine parainfluenza-3 virus (bPI3V) are major causes of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in newborn calves worldwide. Vaccination is widely used to prevent BRD, and intranasal vaccines for BRSV and bPI3V were developed to overcome interference from BRSV and bPI3V-specific maternally derived antibodies. Many experimental challenge trials have demonstrated that intranasal vaccines for BRSV and bPI3V are efficacious, but effectiveness under field conditions has been demonstrated less often, especially for newborn beef calves. The objective of this field trial was to compare the effectiveness of a newly available commercial BRSV-bPI3V intranasal vaccine with that of a benchmarked one in newborn beef calves reared in a cow-calf system. A total of 935 calves from 39 farms were randomized into two vaccine groups (Bovalto Respi Intranasal [Vaccine A], n=468; Rispoval RS+PI3 Intranasal [Vaccine B], n=467), and monitored during the in-house risk period up to three months after vaccination. Non-inferiority analysis was performed by calculating the difference in BRD prevalence between the two vaccine groups. No significant differences were observed between vaccines regarding clinical outcomes of morbidity, mortality, duration between vaccination and BRD occurrence, or treatments required. Because the upper limit of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval of the difference in BRD prevalence between the two treatment groups (0.8%) was less than the margin of non-inferiority (δ=5%), a non-inferiority of Vaccine A was concluded. In conclusion, Vaccine A is at least as effective as Vaccine B for the prevention of BRD in newborn beef cattle in a cow-calf system under field conditions.

Indexed as

Animals, NewbornAdministration, IntranasalAnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesFemaleMaleParainfluenza Virus 3, BovineRespiratory Syncytial Virus, BovineRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsRespiratory Tract InfectionsRespirovirus InfectionsTreatment OutcomeViral VaccinesViral VaccinesBovineBovine parainfluenza-3 virusBovine respiratory syncytial virusCalfIntranasal vaccineVaccination

Identifiers

PMID32928493
PMCPMC7437571
OpenAlexW3058987183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.