ArticleTalanta2020
Rational design and characterization of a lateral flow assay for canine C-reactive protein in wound exudate.
Article in Talanta, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Field‑use device for the electrochemical quantification of carbamazepine levels in a background of human saliva.Journal of applied electrochemistry · 2023Article
- Design of Gold Nanoparticle Vertical Flow Assays for Point-of-Care Testing.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Aptamer-modified magnetic SERS substrate for label-based determination of cardiac troponin I.Mikrochimica acta · 2021Article
- Development of a gold-nanorod-based lateral flow immunoassay for a fast and dual-modal detection of C-reactive protein in clinical plasma samples.RSC advances · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
C-reactive protein levels may have clinical value in monitoring different phases of healing and in identifying possible states of infection. As a critical step to further investigate this potential connection, we have demonstrated a lateral flow assay (LFA) for canine CRP level assessment in wound exudate that could be used as a tool in the veterinary clinic setting. In the rational design of our cCRP LFA, we have characterized LFA performance for sequential delivery mode vs. the more common premixed delivery mode using several metrics including dynamic range, sensitivity, limit of detection, and time to result. Although the sequential mode assay results indicated modestly improved signal (3-14%) and limit of detection (in the low ng/mL range for both) for this set of cCRP immunoassay reagents, the premixed mode assay's shorter run time with one less delivery step was chosen for use in this application in which analyte levels are substantially elevated. We have defined a straightforward wound exudate processing procedure that includes centrifugation to extract exudate from canine patient bandages, and subsequent sample dilution for cCRP quantification by our LFA. And, we have demonstrated that our cCRP LFA provides comparable cCRP concentrations to that of gold-standard ELISA performed on the same clinical wound exudate, and serum/plasma samples. Finally, we have highlighted some next steps in the assessment of cCRP as a biomarker for wound healing and infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.