Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32928307›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research2020

Immune responses upon experimental Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae infection of naïve and vaccinated chickens.

Eva Wattrang, Helena Eriksson, Tomas Jinnerot, Maria Persson, Elisabeth Bagge, Robert Söderlund, Mohammad Naghizadeh, Tina Sørensen Dalgaard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eva WattrangDepartment of Microbiology, National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden. eva.wattrang@sva.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9804-169X
Helena ErikssonDepartment of Animal Health and Antimicrobial Strategies, National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden.
Tomas JinnerotDepartment of Microbiology, National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden.
Maria PerssonDepartment of Animal Health and Antimicrobial Strategies, National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden.
Elisabeth BaggeDepartment of Animal Health and Antimicrobial Strategies, National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden.
Robert SöderlundDepartment of Microbiology, National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mohammad NaghizadehDepartment of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Tina Sørensen DalgaardDepartment of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Swedish Veterinary Agency · SEAarhus University · DK

Funding

Animal Health and Welfare ERA-Net (ANIHWA) ID number 119Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas 942-2015-766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Erysipelas, a disease caused by Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae (ER), is an increasing problem in laying hens housed in cage-free systems. This study aimed to monitor immune responses during ER infection of naïve chickens and chickens vaccinated intra muscularly with a commercial inactivated ER vaccine. Chickens were infected intra muscularly with ER at 30 days of age and blood leukocyte counts, serum levels of mannose binding lectin (MBL) and ER-specific IgY were monitored until the experiment was terminated at day 15 after infection. ER was detected in blood from more chickens and at higher bacterial counts in the naïve group (day 1: 1 of 7 chickens; day 3: 6 of 6 chickens) than in the vaccinated group (day 1: 0 of 7 chickens; day 3: 1 of 6 chickens). During the acute phase of infection transient increases in circulating heterophil numbers and serum MBL levels were detected in all ER infected chickens but these responses were prolonged in chickens from the naïve group compared to vaccinated chickens. Before infection IgY titers to ER in vaccinated chickens did not differ significantly from those of naïve chickens but vaccinated chickens showed significantly increased IgY titers to ER earlier after infection compared to chickens in the naïve group. In conclusion, the ER infection elicited prompt acute innate responses in all chickens. Vaccinated chickens did not have high IgY titers to ER prior to infection but did however show lower levels of bacteraemia and their acute immune responses were of shorter duration.

Indexed as

ChickensImmunity, InnateAnimalsAvian ProteinsErysipelothrixErysipelothrix InfectionsFemaleImmunoglobulinsLeukocyte CountMannose-Binding LectinPoultry DiseasesSpecific Pathogen-Free OrganismsAvian ProteinsIgYImmunoglobulinsMannose-Binding LectinCD45chickenchicken mannose receptor MRC1L-BErysipelothrix rhusiopathiaeIgYleukocyte countsmannose-binding lectin

Identifiers

PMID32928307
PMCPMC7488726
OpenAlexW3084964314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.