ArticleSystematic reviews2020
Motor performance and back pain in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions on Barriers to the Participation of Adolescents in Physical Activity: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Pooled it
- Relationship between depression and quality of life among students: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Barriers to high school and university students' physical activity: A systematic review.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- Researchers' Mental Health and Quality of Life: A Protocol for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Impact of Polymorphisms in Genes Related to Vitamin D Metabolism on Serum Response to Supplementation in Adults and Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Food consumption and mental health in children and adolescents: A systematic review protocol.MethodsX · 2024Article
- Article
- Factors influencing the work of researchers in Scientific Initiation: A systematic review protocol.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Administrative professionals' quality of life in educational institutions: a systematic review protocol.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Prevalence and Risk Factors of Musculoskeletal Disorders in Basketball Players: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Thoracic Spine Pain in High School Adolescents: A One-Year Longitudinal Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Relationship between low-back pain and flexibility in children: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Interventions towards barriers to the practice of physical activity in adolescence: A systematic review protocol.PloS one · 2023Article
- Tools for Assessing Knowledge of Back Health in Adolescents: A Systematic Review Protocol.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Antitumor Properties of Curcumin in Breast Cancer Based on Preclinical Studies: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2022Review
- Evaluation Instruments for Assessing Back Pain in Athletes: A Systematic Review Protocol.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe relationship between motor performance and back pain in children and adolescents remains unclear. This article describes the protocol for a systematic review to summarize the knowledge about the association between motor performance, such as agility, flexibility, balance, strength, muscle endurance, and cardiorespiratory fitness, and back pain. Thus, our aim is to identify the influence of motor performance on back pain among children and adolescents.
methodsTwo independent researchers will search MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, SPORTDiscus, and CINAHL databases, with no period or language restrictions. We will include cross-sectional, cohort, case-control, and controlled clinical trial studies based on the following criteria: (a) participants from 6 to 19 years of age, (b) assessment of motor performance, (c) assessment of back pain, and (d) report measures of associations between motor performance and back pain. Study quality and risk of bias will be assessed using an adapted version of the Downs and Black instrument. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations will be used to assess the strength of the body of evidence. Meta-analyses of association measures will be performed for each type of motor performance, separately for different study types. The results will be reported using forest to show the pooled effect of findings and funnel plots to assess precision of the data. If studies are not homogeneous, results from the meta-analyses will not be reported. Associations will then be synthesized descriptively using a pragmatic approach. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will provide critical insights into the association between motor performance and back pain among children and adolescents; this information may help support clinical practice guidelines as well as public health programs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Protocol was written according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020178496.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.