Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32928303›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2020

Motor performance and back pain in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Matias Noll, Niels Wedderkopp, Carolina Rodrigues Mendonça, Per Kjaer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions on Barriers to the Participation of Adolescents in Physical Activity: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Matias NollInstituto Federal Goiano, Ceres, Brazil. matias.noll@ifgoiano.edu.br.ORCID 0000-0002-1482-0718
Niels WedderkoppDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense, Denmark. nwedderkopp@health.sdu.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-9660-6618
Carolina Rodrigues MendonçaPostgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9902-8227
Per KjaerDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense, Denmark. pkjaer@health.sdu.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-5340-8649
University of Southern Denmark · DKUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe relationship between motor performance and back pain in children and adolescents remains unclear. This article describes the protocol for a systematic review to summarize the knowledge about the association between motor performance, such as agility, flexibility, balance, strength, muscle endurance, and cardiorespiratory fitness, and back pain. Thus, our aim is to identify the influence of motor performance on back pain among children and adolescents.

methodsTwo independent researchers will search MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, SPORTDiscus, and CINAHL databases, with no period or language restrictions. We will include cross-sectional, cohort, case-control, and controlled clinical trial studies based on the following criteria: (a) participants from 6 to 19 years of age, (b) assessment of motor performance, (c) assessment of back pain, and (d) report measures of associations between motor performance and back pain. Study quality and risk of bias will be assessed using an adapted version of the Downs and Black instrument. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations will be used to assess the strength of the body of evidence. Meta-analyses of association measures will be performed for each type of motor performance, separately for different study types. The results will be reported using forest to show the pooled effect of findings and funnel plots to assess precision of the data. If studies are not homogeneous, results from the meta-analyses will not be reported. Associations will then be synthesized descriptively using a pragmatic approach. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will provide critical insights into the association between motor performance and back pain among children and adolescents; this information may help support clinical practice guidelines as well as public health programs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Protocol was written according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020178496.

Indexed as

Back PainCardiorespiratory FitnessAdolescentCase-Control StudiesChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMeta-Analysis as TopicResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicBack painPainProtocolPsychomotor performanceSystematic reviewTeenagers

Identifiers

PMID32928303
PMCPMC7491087
OpenAlexW3086000406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.