Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32928298›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

Meaningful Activities and Recovery (MA&R): the effect of a novel rehabilitation intervention among persons with psychiatric disabilities on activity engagement-study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Siv Therese Bogevik Bjørkedal, Ulrika Bejerholm, Lene Falgaard Eplov, Tom Møller

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03963245 (Project Meaningful Activities and Recovery), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03963245 nacompletednot on this map

Project Meaningful Activities and Recovery (MA&R)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmager HospitalRan2018 to 2021Enrolled139ConditionsMental IllnessArmsMeaningful Activities and Recovery, Standard Care and Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The Role of Courtyards within Acute Mental Health Wards: Designing with Recovery in Mind.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Siv Therese Bogevik BjørkedalTeam for Inclusion and Recovery, CORE: Copenhagen Research Center for Mental Health, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 15, opg. 3A, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark. Siv-Therese.Bogevik.Bjoerkedal@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8252-389X
Ulrika BejerholmDepartment of Health Sciences, Mental Health, Activity and Participation (MAP), Centre for Evidence Based Psychosocial Interventions (CEPI), Lund University, Box 157, SE-221 00, Lund, Sweden.
Lene Falgaard EplovTeam for Inclusion and Recovery, CORE: Copenhagen Research Center for Mental Health, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 15, opg. 3A, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
Tom MøllerCKO University Hospital of Copenhagen Rigshospitalet dep. 8513, 2100, Copenhagen East, Denmark.
Gentofte Hospital · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKLund University · SE

Funding

Danish Occupational Therapy Association FF-117-R45-A1271Region Hovedstaden N/ATrygFonden ID number 112526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEngagement in activities meaningful to the individual may support the process of recovery in those with mental illness. Persons with psychiatric disabilities may reduce their engagement in meaningful activities to various degrees with possible fluctuations over time. We hypothesized that activity engagement can be altered when opportunities and support are offered at an individual and a group peer-based level. Evidence is lacking regarding mental health interventions that enable engagement in meaningful activities, and powered effect studies are warranted.

methodsWe propose an 8-month combined individual and group peer-based intervention, Meaningful Activities and Recovery (MA&R), and a study protocol for a multicentre two-armed parallel randomized controlled trial (RCT). The trial investigates the effects of MA&R in community mental health centres in Copenhagen and municipality services in Denmark. The trial will comprise 128 participants with psychiatric disabilities who will be randomized to one of two groups: (1) MA&R in addition to standard mental healthcare or (2) standard mental healthcare alone. The primary outcome is self-reported activity engagement, measured by Profiles of Engagement in People with Severe Mental Illness. Secondary outcomes are recovery, functioning and quality of life. Data will be collected at baseline and at follow-up at the end of the intervention. DISCUSSION: This study adds new knowledge to a field with limited evidence, i.e. the clinical effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions among people with psychiatric disabilities, directly targeting activity engagement. The pragmatic design, regarding in- and exclusion criteria and settings, may allow assessment of the intervention's effect under real-life conditions. The randomization, adequate power and fidelity monitoring allow testing of the intervention's efficacy. The multicentre study design increases the potential for implementation in various mental health settings if the findings are positive. As the nature of the intervention does not permit blinding of the participants or staff, it may increase the risk of expectancy and performance bias. This must be considered when interpreting the findings.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03963245 . Registered on 29 May 2019.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesHumansMental HealthMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRehabilitation, VocationalTreatment OutcomeDisabilityMental healthMental illnessOccupational therapyPeer supportRecoveryRehabilitationWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID32928298
PMCPMC7491082
OpenAlexW3084494539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.