Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32928272›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy2020

A mixed-method comparison of physician-reported beliefs about and barriers to treatment with medications for opioid use disorder.

Rebecca L Haffajee, Barbara Andraka-Christou, Jeremy Attermann, Anna Cupito, Jessica Buche, Angela J Beck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca L HaffajeeFrom the Behavioral Health Workforce Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Barbara Andraka-ChristouDepartment of Health Management & Informatics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA. barbara.andraka@ucf.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6307-6369
Jeremy Attermannthe National Council for Behavioral Health, Washington, D.C, USA.
Anna CupitoDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jessica BucheFrom the Behavioral Health Workforce Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Angela J BeckFrom the Behavioral Health Workforce Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Michigan · USNational Council for Behavioral Health · USRAND Corporation · USUniversity of Central Florida · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002241 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ELLINGROD, VICKI L · 2017 to 2021
$6.9M
CDC HHS U01CE002780NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002241NCIPC CDC HHS U01 CE002780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence demonstrates that medications for treating opioid use disorder (MOUD) -namely buprenorphine, methadone, and extended-release naltrexone-are effective at treating opioid use disorder (OUD) and reducing associated harms. However, MOUDs are heavily underutilized, largely due to the under-supply of providers trained and willing to prescribe the medications.

methodsTo understand comparative beliefs about MOUD and barriers to MOUD, we conducted a mixed-methods study that involved focus group interviews and an online survey disseminated to a random group of licensed U.S. physicians, which oversampled physicians with a preexisting waiver to prescribe buprenorphine. Focus group results were analyzed using thematic analysis. Survey results were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical methods.

resultsStudy findings suggest that physicians have higher perceptions of efficacy for methadone and buprenorphine than for extended-release naltrexone, including for patients with co-occurring mental health disorders. Insurance obstacles, such as prior authorization requirements, were the most commonly cited barrier to prescribing buprenorphine and extended-release naltrexone. Regulatory barriers, such as the training required to obtain a federal waiver to prescribe buprenorphine, were not considered significant barriers by many physicians to prescribing buprenorphine and naltrexone in office-based settings. Nor did physicians perceive diversion to be a prominent barrier to prescribing buprenorphine. In focus groups, physicians identified financial, logistical, and workforce barriers-such as a lack of addiction treatment specialists-as additional barriers to prescribing medications to treat OUD.

conclusionsAdditional education is needed for physicians regarding the comparative efficacy of different OUD medications. Governmental policies should mandate full insurance coverage of and prohibit prior authorization requirements for OUD medications.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug and Narcotic ControlFemaleHumansInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthMaleMental DisordersMethadoneNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineDelayed-Action PreparationsMethadoneNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsBarriersBuprenorphineComparisonDual diagnosisMethadoneNaltrexonePhysiciansPregnantReferralSurvey

Identifiers

PMID32928272
PMCPMC7491096
OpenAlexW3086485040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.