Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32928233›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2020

No evidence of amplified Plasmodium falciparum plasmepsin II gene copy number in an area with artemisinin-resistant malaria along the China-Myanmar border.

Fang Huang, Biraj Shrestha, Hui Liu, Lin-Hua Tang, Shui-Sen Zhou, Xiao-Nong Zhou, Shannon Takala-Harrison, Pascal Ringwald, Myaing M Nyunt, Christopher V Plowe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation of the Effect of Gene Duplication by Genome Editing on Drug Resistance inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Fang HuangNational Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. huangfang@nipd.chinacdc.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1105-0874
Biraj ShresthaCenter for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Hui LiuYunnan Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Puer, People's Republic of China.
Lin-Hua TangNational Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Shui-Sen ZhouNational Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Nong ZhouNational Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Shannon Takala-HarrisonCenter for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Pascal RingwaldGlobal Malaria Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Myaing M NyuntDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Christopher V PloweDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
National Institute for Parasitic Diseases · CNDuke University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USWorld Health Organization · CHYunnan Institute of Parasitic Diseases · CN

Funding

Identification and validation of molecular markers of piperaquine resistanceR01AI125579 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI HARRISON, SHANNON TAKALA · 2017 to 2021
$1.6M
National Important Scientific & Technological Project 2018ZX10101002-002Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai 18ZR1443400NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI125579NIH HHS R01-AI125579Overseas Public Health Training Programme of the Shanghai Health Bureau GWHW201210WHO Mekong Malaria Programme WP/08/MVP/000512WHO Mekong Malaria Programme WP/10/MVP/005837World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe emergence and spread of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum poses a threat to malaria eradication, including China's plan to eliminate malaria by 2020. Piperaquine (PPQ) resistance has emerged in Cambodia, compromising an important partner drug that is widely used in China in the form of dihydroartemisinin (DHA)-PPQ. Several mutations in a P. falciparum gene encoding a kelch protein on chromosome 13 (k13) are associated with artemisinin resistance and have arisen spread in the Great Mekong subregion, including the China-Myanmar border. Multiple copies of the plasmepsin II/III (pm2/3) genes, located on chromosome 14, have been shown to be associated with PPQ resistance.

methodsThe therapeutic efficacy of DHA-PPQ for the treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum was evaluated along the China-Myanmar border from 2010 to 2014. The dry blood spots samples collected in the efficacy study prior DHA-PPQ treatment and from the local hospital by passive detection were used to amplify k13 and pm2. Polymorphisms within k13 were genotyped by capillary sequencing and pm2 copy number was quantified by relative-quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Treatment outcome was evaluated with the World Health Organization protocol. A linear regression model was used to estimate the association between the day 3 positive rate and k13 mutation and the relationship of the pm2 copy number variants and k13 mutations.

resultsDHA-PPQ was effective for uncomplicated P. falciparum infection in Yunnan Province with cure rates > 95%. Twelve non synonymous mutations in the k13 domain were observed among the 268 samples with the prevalence of 44.0% and the predominant mutation was F446I with a prevalence of 32.8%. Only one sample was observed with multi-copies of pm2, including parasites with and without k13 mutations. The therapeutic efficacy of DHA-PPQ was > 95% along the China-Myanmar border, consistent with the lack of amplification of pm2.

conclusionDHA-PPQ for uncomplicated P. falciparum infection still showed efficacy in an area with artemisinin-resistant malaria along the China-Myanmar border. There was no evidence to show PPQ resistance by clinical study and molecular markers survey. Continued monitoring of the parasite population using molecular markers will be important to track emergence and spread of resistance in this region.

Indexed as

Gene DosageAntimalarialsArtemisininsAspartic Acid EndopeptidasesChinaDrug ResistanceMalaria, FalciparumMyanmarPlasmodium falciparumProtozoan ProteinsAntimalarialsartemisininArtemisininsAspartic Acid Endopeptidasesplasmepsin IIProtozoan ProteinsArtemisinin resistanceChina–Myanmar borderPiperaquinePlasmepsin IIPlasmodium falciparum

Identifiers

PMID32928233
PMCPMC7488220
OpenAlexW3086370021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.