Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32928217›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2020

The trend of caesarean birth rate changes in China after 'universal two-child policy' era: a population-based study in 2013-2018.

Jie Yan, Long Wang, Ying Yang, Ya Zhang, Hongguang Zhang, Yuan He, Zuoqi Peng, Yuanyuan Wang, Qiaomei Wang, Haiping Shen and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jie YanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, No.1 Xi'anmen Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Long WangChina DOHaD Research Centre, China DOHaD Research Centre, National Human Genetic Resources Centre, No. 12 Dahuisi Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China.
Ying YangChina DOHaD Research Centre, China DOHaD Research Centre, National Human Genetic Resources Centre, No. 12 Dahuisi Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China. yangying@nrifp.org.cn.
Ya ZhangNational Research Institute for Family Planning, No. 12 Dahuisi Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China.
Hongguang ZhangNational Research Institute for Family Planning, No. 12 Dahuisi Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China.
Yuan HeNational Research Institute for Family Planning, No. 12 Dahuisi Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China.
Zuoqi PengNational Research Institute for Family Planning, No. 12 Dahuisi Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China.
Yuanyuan WangNational Research Institute for Family Planning, No. 12 Dahuisi Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China.
Qiaomei WangDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, National Health Commission of the PRC, No. 1 Xizhimenwai Road (South), Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Haiping ShenDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, National Health Commission of the PRC, No. 1 Xizhimenwai Road (South), Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Yiping ZhangDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, National Health Commission of the PRC, No. 1 Xizhimenwai Road (South), Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Donghai YanDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, National Health Commission of the PRC, No. 1 Xizhimenwai Road (South), Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Xu MaChina DOHaD Research Centre, China DOHaD Research Centre, National Human Genetic Resources Centre, No. 12 Dahuisi Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China. genetic88@126.com.
Huixia YangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, No.1 Xi'anmen Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China. yanghuixia@bjmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-6472-5770
National Health and Family Planning Commission · CNTianjin Municipal Research Institute for Family Planning · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

Beijing Talents Foundation from organization department of Beijing municipal committee of the CPC 2016000021223ZK20CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical sciences 2018-I2M-1-004National Key Research and Development Program of China 2016YFC1000307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe universal two-child policy in China which was announced in October 2015 might affect the caesarean birth rate. Few studies reported the caesarean birth rate affected by the policy especially after the universal two-child policy period. This study aimed to demonstrate the caesarean birth rate changes before and after the universal two-child policy and further elaborate the underlying influencing factors.

methodsThis nationwide, retrospective, population-based study was based on National Free Pre-Pregnancy Check-ups Project (NFPCP). Couples planning to conceive in next 6 months were encouraged to participate in NFPCP. Baseline information was collected using a standardized questionnaire with a face-to-face interview, and medical examinations were conducted. Two rounds of follow-up interviews were then conducted by trained nurses to update pregnancy status and outcomes. NFPCP participants who completed deliveries before December 31, 2018, were included in the current study. We used marginal effect of year to examine the trend of caesarean birth rate over time and interrupted time series (ITS) analysis to determine impacts of the universal two-child policy on the trend of caesarean birth rate.

resultsA total of 9,398,045 participants were included in the final analysis. High-risk factors to increase caesarean birth rate were identified. In the current study, the standardized caesarean birth rate declined from 34.1% in 2013 to 31.8% in 2015 and increased to 35.6% in 2018. ITS analysis showed the caesarean birth rate decreased by 0.1% (95% CI 0.1-0.1) per month before the release of universal two-child policy, 1.3% (95% CI 0.6-2.1%) absolute drop during the policy release month, and increased by 0.2% (95% CI 0.1-0.2%) per month after the policy implementation. For the period after the policy release, the increasing trends were observed in rural participants and urban primiparas. The prevalence of caesarean birth rates within China varied regionally.

conclusionsThe decreasing trend of caesarean birth rate was reported after immediate release of the universal two-child policy. An increasing trend of caesarean birth rate was observed 2-3 years after the policy. It reminds us that the caesarean birth rate control is a long-lasting process and all the strategies need to be continually reinforced.

Indexed as

AdultBirth RateCesarean SectionChinaFemaleHistory, 21st CenturyHumansLongitudinal StudiesPolicyPregnancyRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultCaesarean birth rateNational Free Pre-Pregnancy Check-ups Project (NFPCP)Universal two-child policy

Identifiers

PMID32928217
PMCPMC7491061
OpenAlexW3086052650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.