Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32928194›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2020

A survey of ethnomedicinal plants used to treat cancer by traditional medicine practitioners in Zimbabwe.

Patrick Rutendo Matowa, Mazuru Gundidza, Lovemore Gwanzura, Charles F B Nhachi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Phenolics Extracted fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. 7-Geranyloxycinnamic Acid Isolated fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Frontiers in chemistry · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Biology, chemistry, and pharmacological activity ofJournal of medicinally active plants · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patrick Rutendo MatowaClinical Pharmacology Department, University of Zimbabwe, Mt Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe. patmat01@yahoo.co.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3022-7623
Mazuru GundidzaPharmaceutical Technology Department, Harare Institute of Technology, Belvedere, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Lovemore GwanzuraMedical Laboratory Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Mt pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Charles F B NhachiClinical Pharmacology Department, University of Zimbabwe, Mt Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe.
University of Zimbabwe · ZWHarare Institute of Technology · ZW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional medicine plays an important role in health care provision in the developing world. A number of cancer patients have been found to be using traditional medicine as primary therapy and/or as complementary medicine. Cancer is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality globally among the non-communicable diseases. The aim of this study was to identify the plants used by traditional medicine practitioners (TMPs) in Zimbabwe to treat cancer.

methodsA structured questionnaire was used to interview consenting registered TMPs on ethnomedicinal plants they use to treat cancer. A review of published literature on the cited plants was also carried out. The practitioners were asked about the plants that they use to treat cancer, the plant parts used, type of cancer treated, other medicinal uses of the plants and preparation and administration of the plant parts.

resultsTwenty (20) TMPs took part in the study. A total of 18 medicinal plant species were cited. The commonly treated types of cancer were breast, prostate, colon, skin and blood cancers with most plants being used to treat skin, blood and breast cancers, respectively. Of the medicinal plants cited, 44.4% were used to treat all cancer types. The most used plant parts were the roots (72.2%) and leaves (72.2%) followed by the bark (38.9%). The medicinal plants were used for multiple ailments. The most common plant preparation methods were infusion (72.2%) and decoction (66.7%) and the oral route of administration, as extracts and powder put in tea and porridge, was the most used.

conclusionThe frequently used plant parts were leaves and roots. The traditional uses of the medicinal plants cited in this study resonate well with their reported uses from other ethnopharmacological studies done in other parts of the world. The plants used by TMPs to treat cancer in Zimbabwe, if adequately explored, can be instrumental in the discovery and development of cancer drugs.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedEthnobotanyFemaleHumansMaleMedicine, African TraditionalMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPhytotherapyPlants, MedicinalSurveys and QuestionnairesZimbabweCancerMedicinal plantsTraditional medicineTraditional medicine practitioners

Identifiers

PMID32928194
PMCPMC7488988
OpenAlexW3085293458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.