ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2020
Timing for closed reduction procedure for developmental dysplasia of the hip and its failure analysis.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Salter and Pemberton osteotomies in developmental dysplasia of the hip: the role of the congruity index as a prognostic factor.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Residual Acetabular Dysplasia in Young Children: a Comprehensive Review of Diagnosis and Management.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026Review
- Closed Reduction and Spica Cast Immobilization in Patients Aged 18 Months and Older With Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- Risk factors for residual acetabular dysplasia after closed reduction treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Article
- Rates and risk factors for failure of reduction in closed reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EFORT open reviews · 2024Article
- Protective effect of modified lange "second position" for developing avascular necrosis following closed reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Impact of Failed Pavlik Harness Treatment on the Outcomes Following Closed or Open Reduction in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Short-term outcomes of treatment in children presenting with DDH in walking age - An analysis of 84 hips.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2022Article
- The Global Research Trends and Hotspots on Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Bibliometric and Visualized Study.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Article
- Narrative Review of Complications Following DDH Treatment.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIt remains controversial whether the older age to perform closed reduction (CR) procedure for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), the higher incidence of complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the midterm outcome of CR for DDH among different age groups, and to analyze and identify risk factors for the failure of this procedure.
methodsClinical data of 107 DDH patients, who received CR, were retrospectively reviewed. Data were divided into three groups according to initial treatment age (Group I: younger than 12 months; Group II: 12 months to less or equal to18 months; Group III: older than 18 months). The presence of avascular necrosis (AVN), residual acetabular dysplasia (RAD), re-dislocation, and further surgeries (FS) were observed. The risk factors were identified for those outcomes aforementioned using univariable logistic regression models. For identified risk factor age, pre-op acetabular index (AI) and post-op AI, their prediction of CR failure were evaluated by receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC).
resultsA total of 107 patients (156 hips) undergoing CR procedure were evaluated with a median age at initial reduction of 13.0 ± 5.4 months (range, 4 to 28 mo). Mean follow-up time in this study was 6.7 ± 0.8 years (range, 3-8 years). The incidence of AVN, RAD and re-dislocation was 15.4% (24/156), 17.3% (27/156) and 14.7% (23/156) respectively. For AVN, RAD and re-dislocation, the significant risk factors are pre-op IHDI IV (p = 0.033), age ≥ 18 months (p = 0.012), and pre-op IHDI IV (p = 0.004) and walking (p = 0.011), respectively. The areas under the ROC curve of each type of failures were 0.841 (post-op AI), 0.688 (pre-op AI) and 0.650 (age).
conclusionsSevere DDH patients older than 18 months with CR procedure may result in a high risk of RAD complication. Re-dislocation is significantly associated with pre-op IHDI IV and walking. Patients, who are older than 12.5 months or have a pre-op AI of 38.7° or a post-op AI of 26.4°, are also more likely to fail of CR procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.