Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32928164›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2020

The relations among worry, meta-worry, intolerance of uncertainty and attentional bias for threat in men at high risk for generalized anxiety disorder: a network analysis.

Lei Ren, Zhou Yang, Yidi Wang, Long-Biao Cui, Yinchuan Jin, Zhujing Ma, Qintao Zhang, Zhongying Wu, Hua-Ning Wang, Qun Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mental Health Concerns in Patients with COVID-19: A Network Analysis.Psychology research and behavior management · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lei RenDepartment of Clinical Psychology, School of Medical Psychology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Zhou YangDepartment of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Yidi WangCollege of Education, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, USA.
Long-Biao CuiDepartment of Clinical Psychology, School of Medical Psychology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Yinchuan JinDepartment of Clinical Psychology, School of Medical Psychology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Zhujing MaDepartment of Clinical Psychology, School of Medical Psychology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Qintao ZhangDepartment of Clinical Psychology, School of Medical Psychology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Zhongying WuDepartment of Clinical Psychology, School of Medical Psychology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Hua-Ning WangDepartment of Psychiatry, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China. xskzhu@fmmu.edu.cn.
Qun YangDepartment of Clinical Psychology, School of Medical Psychology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China. yangqun1125@hotmail.com.
Air Force Medical University · CNNorthern Arizona University · USSeattle University · USXijing Hospital · CN

Funding

Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province 2020SF-245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproving the psychotherapies for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is dependent on a deeper understanding of the relations between GAD and its associated cognitive factors. In the present study, we investigate how the core feature of GAD (i.e., worry) and its associated cognitive factors, such as meta-worry, intolerance of uncertainty, and attention bias towards threat, relate to each other in men at high risk for GAD.

methodsWe used network analysis to explore the relations among these variables in a cross-sectional sample of 122 men at high risk for generalized anxiety disorder. Specifically, we computed the expected influence and predictability of each variable.

resultsIn the final network, we found that worry and meta-worry had the highest expected influence and predictability. In contrast, attention bias towards threat showed the lowest expected influence and predictability. The estimates of the expected influence of the nodes were stable (correlation stability coefficient = 0.52).

conclusionsThe present study is the first to investigate the relations among worry, meta-worry, intolerance of uncertainty, and attention bias towards threat in men at high risk for generalized anxiety disorder. These findings indicate that worry and meta-worry may play important roles in the present network. The implications for clinical interventions and future studies are discussed.

Indexed as

Attentional BiasAnxietyAnxiety DisordersCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMaleUncertaintyAttention biasGeneralized anxiety disorderHigh riskIntolerance of uncertaintyMeta-worryNetwork analysisWorry

Identifiers

PMID32928164
PMCPMC7491186
OpenAlexW3084872971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.