Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32928127›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2020

Establishment of a novel nomogram for the clinically diagnostic prediction of minimal change disease, -a common cause of nephrotic syndrome.

Gaofei Yan, Guanzhi Liu, Xuefei Tian, Lifang Tian, Hao Wang, Peiyao Ren, Xiaotao Ma, Rongguo Fu, Zhao Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gaofei YanDepartment of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710005, China.
Guanzhi LiuBone and Joint Surgery Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710005, China.
Xuefei TianDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale University school of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Lifang TianDepartment of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710005, China.
Hao WangDepartment of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710005, China.
Peiyao RenDepartment of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710005, China.
Xiaotao MaDepartment of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710005, China.
Rongguo FuDepartment of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710005, China.
Zhao ChenDepartment of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710005, China. icetsblueluya@126.com.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNYale University · US

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province 2016KTCL03-07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMinimal change disease (MCD) is one of the major causes of nephrotic syndrome (NS). A confirmed MCD diagnosis mainly depends on renal biopsy at present, which is an invasive procedure with many potential risks. The overall incidence of complications caused by renal biopsy procedures has been reported as approximately 11 and 6.6% outside and within China, respectively. Unfortunately, there is currently no noninvasive procedure or practical classification method for distinguishing MCD from other primary glomerular diseases available.

methodA total of 1009 adult patients who underwent renal biopsy between January 2017 and November 2019 were enrolled in this study. Twenty-five parameters extracted from patient demographics, clinical manifestations, and laboratory test results were statistically analysed. LASSO regression analysis was further performed on these parameters. The parameters with the highest area under the curve (AUC) were selected and used to establish a logistic diagnostic prediction model.

resultsOf the 25 parameters, 14 parameters were significantly different (P < 0.05). MCD patients were mostly younger (36 (22, 55) vs. 41 (28.75, 53)) and male (59% vs. 52%) and had lower levels of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (79 (71, 85.5) vs. 80 (74, 89)) and IgG (5.42 (3.17, 6.36) vs. 9.38 (6.79, 12.02)) and higher levels of IgM (1.44 (0.96, 1.88) vs. 1.03 (0.71, 1.45)) and IgE (160 (46.7, 982) vs. 47.3 (19, 126)) than those in the non-MCD group. Using the LASSO model, we established a classifier for adults based on four parameters: DBP and the serum levels of IgG, IgM, IgE. We were able to clinically classify adult patients with NS into MCD and non-MCD using this model. The validation accuracy of the logistic regression model was 0.88. A nomogram based on these four classifiers was developed for clinical use that could predict the probability of MCD in adult patients with NS.

conclusionsA LASSO model can be used to distinguish MCD from other primary glomerular diseases in adult patients with NS. Combining the model and the nomogram potentially provides a novel and valuable approach for nephrologists to diagnose MCD, avoiding the complications caused by renal biopsy.

Indexed as

Blood PressureAdultArea Under CurveComplement C1qComplement C3Complement C4DiastoleFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHemoglobinsHumansImmunoglobulin EImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MMaleMiddle AgedComplement C1qComplement C3Complement C4HemoglobinsImmunoglobulin EImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MMinimal change diseaseMultiparameter analysisNoninvasivePredict

Identifiers

PMID32928127
PMCPMC7490860
OpenAlexW3086813997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.