Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2020
Dynamic needle tip positioning versus the angle-distance technique for ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation in adults: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03656978 (Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Puncture and Catheterization), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Puncture and Catheterization
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasound guidance for arterial (other than femoral) catheterisation in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Effect of mild sedation and analgesia on radial artery cannulation in novice residents: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2024Trial
- Arterial cannulation with ultrasound: clinical trial protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing handheld ultrasoundBJA open · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Optimizing precision in ICU arterial access: the impact of ultrasound-guided dynamic needle tip positioning.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of two ultrasound-guided techniques for radial arterial cannulation in adults - Observational cross-sectional study.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2023Article
- BiplanarBJA open · 2023Article
- Needle visualization during ultrasound-guided puncture: image optimization.Jornal vascular brasileiro · 2023Article
- Ultrasound-Guided Dynamic Needle-Tip Positioning Method Is Superior to Conventional Palpation and Ultrasound Method in Arterial Catheterization.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- The Improved Catheterization Is Associated With the Deeper Radial Arteries in Ultrasound-Guided Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning Technique.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Longitudinal axis approach versus longitudinal oblique axis approach for ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation in adult patients: A comparative study.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUltrasound guidance can increase the success rate and reduce the incidence of complications of arterial cannulation. There are few studies on the utility of the dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP) technique versus the angle-distance (AD) technique for ultrasound-guided radial arterial cannulation in adult surgical patients. We assessed and compared the success rates and incidences of complications of these two short-axis out-of-plane techniques.
methodsA total of 131 adult surgical patients were randomized into DNTP and AD groups to undergo ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation. The primary outcome was first-pass success without posterior wall puncture. The secondary outcomes included the first-pass success rate, 10-min overall success rate, cannulation time, posterior wall puncture, and the number of skin punctures.
resultsThe first-pass success rates without posterior wall puncture were 53.8% in the DNTP group and 44.6% in the AD group (RR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.86-1.72; P = 0.26). The cannulation time was significantly longer (P = 0.01) in the DNTP group [79.65 (54.3-109.4) seconds] than in the AD group [47.6 (24.9-103.8) seconds]. The posterior wall puncture rate was significantly lower (P = 0.002) in the DNTP group (29.2%) than in the AD group (56.1%; RR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.42-0.82).
conclusionsThere were no significant differences in the first-pass success rate, with or without arterial posterior wall puncture, or in the 10-min overall success rate between the DNTP and AD groups. However, the cannulation time was longer and the posterior wall puncture rate was lower in the DNTP group.
trial registrationThe trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (No: NCT03656978 ). Registered 4 September 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.