Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32928099›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

Differences in midgut transcriptomes between resistant and susceptible strains of Chilo suppressalis to Cry1C toxin.

Geng Chen, Yanhui Wang, Yanmin Liu, Fajun Chen, Lanzhi Han

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Geng ChenDepartment of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Yanhui WangDepartment of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Yanmin LiuDepartment of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Fajun ChenDepartment of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China. fajunchen@njau.edu.cn.
Lanzhi HanThe State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China. lzhan@ippcaas.cn.
Nanjing Agricultural University · CNChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

National Genetically Modified Organisms Key Breeding Projects of China 2016ZX08011-001National Genetically Modified Organisms Key Breeding Projects of China 2016ZX08012-005National Genetically Modified Organisms Key Breeding Projects of China 2018ZX0801101BNational Natural Science Foundation of China 31572336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChilo suppressalis is a widespread rice pest that poses a major threat to food security in China. This pest can develop resistance to Cry toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), threatening the sustainable use of insect-resistant transgenic Bt rice. However, the molecular basis for the resistance mechanisms of C. suppressalis to Cry1C toxin remains unknown. This study aimed to identify genes associated with the mechanism of Cry1C resistance in C. suppressalis by comparing the midgut transcriptomic responses of resistant and susceptible C. suppressalis strains to Cry1C toxin and to provide information for insect resistance management.

resultsA C. suppressalis midgut transcriptome of 139,206 unigenes was de novo assembled from 373 million Illumina HiSeq and Roche 454 clean reads. Comparative analysis identified 5328 significantly differentially expressed unigenes (DEGs) between C. suppressalis Cry1C-resistant and -susceptible strains. DEGs encoding Bt Cry toxin receptors, aminopeptidase-P like protein, the ABC subfamily and alkaline phosphatase were downregulated, suggesting an association with C. suppressalis Cry1C resistance. Additionally, Cry1C resistance in C. suppressalis may be related to changes in the transcription levels of enzymes involved in hydrolysis, digestive, catalytic and detoxification processes.

conclusionOur study identified genes potentially involved in Cry1C resistance in C. suppressalis by comparative transcriptome analysis. The assembled and annotated transcriptome data provide valuable genomic resources for further study of the molecular mechanisms of C. suppressalis resistance to Cry toxins.

Indexed as

Insecticide ResistanceTranscriptomeAlkaline PhosphataseAminopeptidasesAnimalsATP-Binding Cassette TransportersBacillus thuringiensis ToxinsEndotoxinsHemolysin ProteinsInsect ProteinsIntestinal MucosaLepidopteraReceptors, Cell SurfaceAlkaline PhosphataseAminopeptidasesATP-Binding Cassette TransportersBacillus thuringiensis ToxinsCry toxin receptorsEndotoxinsHemolysin Proteinsinsecticidal crystal protein, Bacillus ThuringiensisInsect ProteinsReceptors, Cell SurfaceChilo suppressalisCry1C toxinDifferenceResistance mechanismTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID32928099
PMCPMC7490912
OpenAlexW3086326440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.