Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32928035›Full record

ArticleOtolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2021

Communicative Participation and Quality of Life in Pretreatment Oral and Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Cancer.

Cara Sauder, Mara Kapsner-Smith, Carolyn Baylor, Kathryn Yorkston, Neal Futran, Tanya Eadie

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effectiveness of mHealth intervention for trismus exercise in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing proton and heavy ion therapy: a randomized control trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Assessing Long-Term Quality of Life Concerns Through Survivorship Clinic in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cara SauderDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Mara Kapsner-SmithDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Carolyn BaylorDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Kathryn YorkstonDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Neal FutranDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Tanya EadieDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Communication Outcomes After Head & Neck CancerR01CA177635 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI EADIE, TANYA L · 2014 to 2018
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA177635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine how communicative participation is affected in patients with oral and oropharyngeal head and neck cancers (HNCs) pretreatment and whether communication function predicts HNC-specific quality of life (QOL) before treatment, beyond known demographic, medical, psychosocial, and swallowing predictors. STUDY

designCross-sectional study.

settingTertiary care academic medical center.

methodsEighty-seven patients with primary oral (40.2%) or oropharyngeal (59.8%) HNC were recruited prior to treatment. T stage, tumor site, and p16 status were extracted from medical records. Demographic and patient-reported measures were obtained. Communicative participation was measured using the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) General short form. A hierarchical regression analysis included demographic, medical, psychosocial, and functional measures of swallowing and communication as predictors; the University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL v4) composite score was the predicted variable.

resultsMedian (SD) baseline CPIB scores were 71.0 (11.83); patients with oral cancers reported worse scores. A final sequential hierarchical regression model that included all variables explained 71% of variance in QOL scores. Tumor site, T stage, and p16 status accounted for 28% of variance (

conclusionPretreatment communication predicted QOL and was negatively affected in some oral and oropharyngeal patients with HNC.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMouth NeoplasmsOropharyngeal NeoplasmsProspective StudiesSpeechSpeech DisordersVoiceVoice Disorderscancer outcomescommunication disordershead and neck cancerquality of life

Identifiers

PMID32928035
PMCPMC7933052
OpenAlexW3087233867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.