Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32927873›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Dynamic Shear Modulus and Damping Ratio of Sand-Rubber Mixtures under Large Strain Range.

Jianfeng Li, Jie Cui, Yi Shan, Yadong Li, Bo Ju

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jianfeng LiSchool of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Jie CuiSchool of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Yi ShanSchool of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6513-1189
Yadong LiSchool of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Bo JuSchool of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2017YFC1500400National Natural Science Foundation of China 51778159National Natural Science Foundation of China 51878192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adding rubber into sands has been found to improve the mechanical behavior of sands, including their dynamic properties. However, ambiguous and even contradictory results have been reported regarding the dynamic behavior of sand-rubber mixtures, particularly in terms of the damping ratio. A series of cyclic triaxial tests were, therefore, performed under a large range of shear strains on sand-rubber mixtures with varying rubber volume contents, rubber particle sizes, and confining pressures. The results indicate the dynamic shear modulus decreases with increasing rubber volume content and with decreasing particle size and confining pressure. The relationship of the damping ratio to the evaluated parameters is complicated and strain-dependent; at shear strains less than a critical value, the damping ratio increases with increasing rubber volume content, whereas the opposite trend is observed at greater shear strains. Furthermore, sand-rubber mixtures with different rubber particle sizes exceed the damping ratio of pure sand at different rubber volume contents. A new empirical model to predict the maximum shear moduli of mixtures with various rubber volume contents, rubber particle sizes, and confining pressures is accordingly proposed. This study provides a reference for the design of sand-rubber mixtures in engineering applications.

Indexed as

cyclic triaxial testingdamping ratiodynamic shear modulusempirical modelsand–rubber mixture

Identifiers

PMID32927873
PMCPMC7559381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.