Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32927807›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Evaluating the Genotoxic and Cytotoxic Effects of Thymidine Analogs, 5-Ethynyl-2'-Deoxyuridine and 5-Bromo-2'-Deoxyurdine to Mammalian Cells.

Jeremy S Haskins, Cathy Su, Junko Maeda, Kade D Walsh, Alexis H Haskins, Allison J Allum, Coral E Froning, Takamitsu A Kato

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeremy S HaskinsDepartment of Environmental & Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA.
Cathy SuDepartment of Environmental & Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA.
Junko MaedaDepartment of Environmental & Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA.
Kade D WalshDepartment of Environmental & Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA.
Alexis H HaskinsDepartment of Environmental & Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA.
Allison J AllumDepartment of Environmental & Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA.
Coral E FroningDepartment of Environmental & Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7025-4434
Takamitsu A KatoDepartment of Environmental & Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA.
Colorado State University · US

Funding

Dr Akiko Ueno Radiobiology Fund Na
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BrdU (bromodeoxyuridine) and EdU (ethynyldeoxyuridine) have been largely utilized as the means of monitoring DNA replication and cellular division. Although BrdU induces gene and chromosomal mutations and induces sensitization to photons, EdU's effects have not been extensively studied yet. Therefore, we investigated EdU's potential cytotoxic and mutagenic effects and its related underlying mechanisms when administered to Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) wild type and DNA repair-deficient cells. EdU treatment displayed a higher cytotoxicity and genotoxicity than BrdU treatment. Cells with defective homologous recombination repair displayed a greater growth delay and severe inhibition of clonogenicity with EdU compared to wild type and other DNA repair-deficient cells. Inductions of sister chromatid exchange and hypoxanthine phosphorybosyl transferase (HPRT) mutation were observed in EdU-incorporated cells as well. Interestingly, on the other hand, EdU did not induce sensitization to photons to the same degree as BrdU. Our results demonstrate that elevated concentrations (similar to manufacturers suggested concentration; >5-10 μM) of EdU treatment were toxic to the cell cultures, particularly in cells with a defect in homologous recombination repair. Therefore, EdU should be administered with additional precautions.

Indexed as

A549 CellsAnimalsBromodeoxyuridineCHO CellsCricetulusDeoxyuridineDNA RepairGenes, BRCA2HumansMutagenicity Tests5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridineBromodeoxyuridineDeoxyuridineBrdUDNA repairEdUradiosensitizer

Identifiers

PMID32927807
PMCPMC7555307
OpenAlexW3083872056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.