Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32927752›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

Cooking for Vitality: Pilot Study of an Innovative Culinary Nutrition Intervention for Cancer-Related Fatigue in Cancer Survivors.

Cheryl Pritlove, Geremy Capone, Helena Kita, Stephanie Gladman, Manjula Maganti, Jennifer M Jones

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Patient and carer experience of nutrition care throughout and beyond treatment for head and neck cancer: a qualitative longitudinal study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cheryl PritloveApplied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON M5G 1B1, Canada.
Geremy CaponeCancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.
Helena KitaMD Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2244-0683
Stephanie GladmanCancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.
Manjula MagantiDepartment of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.
Jennifer M JonesCancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CA

Funding

Helderleigh Nutrition Application Fund n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is one of the most prevalent and distressing side effects experienced by patients with cancer during and after treatment, and this negatively impacts all aspects of quality of life. An increasing body of evidence supports the role of poor nutritional status in the etiology of CRF and of specific diets in mitigating CRF. We designed a group-based two session culinary nutrition intervention for CRF, Cooking for Vitality (C4V), aimed at increasing understanding of how food choices can impact energy levels and establishing basic food preparation and cooking skills as well as the application of culinary techniques that minimize the effort/energy required to prepare meals. The purpose of this pilot mixed-method study was to evaluate: Feasibility of the experimental methods and intervention; acceptability and perceived helpfulness of intervention; and to obtain a preliminary estimate of the effectiveness of the intervention on fatigue (primary outcome), energy, overall disability, and confidence to manage fatigue (secondary outcomes). (2) Methods: Prospective, single arm, embedded mixed-methods feasibility study of cancer survivors with cancer-related fatigue was conducted. Participants completed measures at baseline (T0), immediately following the intervention (T1), and three months after the last session (T2). Qualitative interviews were conducted at T2. (3) Results: Recruitment (70%) and retention (72%) rates along with qualitative findings support the feasibility of the C4V intervention for cancer survivors living with CRF (program length and frequency, ease of implementation, and program flexibility). Acceptability was also high and participants provided useful feedback for program improvements. Fatigue (FACT-F) scores significantly improved from T0-T1 and T0-T2 (

Indexed as

CookingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCancer SurvivorsDiet, HealthyFatigueFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNutrition TherapyPatient Education as TopicPilot Projectscancer-related fatiguecancer survivorshipculinarynutrition

Identifiers

PMID32927752
PMCPMC7551599
OpenAlexW3084294798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.