Trial report in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Irene A Garcia-YuInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Unidad de Investigación de Atención Primaria de Salamanca (APISAL), Servicio de Salud de Castilla y León (SACyL), 37005 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2292-3802
Luis Garcia-OrtizInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Unidad de Investigación de Atención Primaria de Salamanca (APISAL), Servicio de Salud de Castilla y León (SACyL), 37005 Salamanca, Spain.
Manuel A Gomez-MarcosInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Unidad de Investigación de Atención Primaria de Salamanca (APISAL), Servicio de Salud de Castilla y León (SACyL), 37005 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0133-6123
Emiliano Rodriguez-SanchezInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Unidad de Investigación de Atención Primaria de Salamanca (APISAL), Servicio de Salud de Castilla y León (SACyL), 37005 Salamanca, Spain.
Olaya Tamayo-MoralesInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Unidad de Investigación de Atención Primaria de Salamanca (APISAL), Servicio de Salud de Castilla y León (SACyL), 37005 Salamanca, Spain.
Jose A Maderuelo-FernandezInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Unidad de Investigación de Atención Primaria de Salamanca (APISAL), Servicio de Salud de Castilla y León (SACyL), 37005 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7544-8684
Jose I Recio-RodriguezInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Unidad de Investigación de Atención Primaria de Salamanca (APISAL), Servicio de Salud de Castilla y León (SACyL), 37005 Salamanca, Spain.
Funding
Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y León GRS 1583/B/17
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Menopause has a negative impact on quality of life (QoL). The aim of the present study was to analyse the effect on QoL of adding 10 g per day of chocolate with a high concentration of cocoa (99%) to the habitual diet, for 6 months, in a sample of postmenopausal women. Postmenopausal women (
Indexed as
CacaoChocolateQuality of LifeAnalysis of VarianceDietDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPostmenopausechocolatepostmenopausequality of liferandomised controlled trial
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Cocoa-Rich Chocolate and Quality of Life in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial. · full record | OpenQuestion