Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32927362›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2020

Transporter engineering in microbial cell factories: the ins, the outs, and the in-betweens.

Steven A van der Hoek, Irina Borodina

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Transporter Engineering for Enhancing Citric Acid Production inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. EngineeringMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Evolution of ABC Importers.Journal of molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Construction of a syntrophicSynthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Steven A van der HoekThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Irina BorodinaThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark. Electronic address: irbo@biosustain.dtu.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engineering the transport of small molecules is an effective approach to improve the performance of microbial cell factories. Transporter engineering can improve the utilization of low-cost alternative substrates, reduce the loss of pathway intermediates, and increase the titer and production rate of the target product. However, transporters are not commonly engineered in strain development programs because the functions of most of the transport proteins are not known. In the recent years, a variety of methods have been developed for identification of transporters for specific substrates and for characterizing transport mechanisms. This review presents recent examples of successful transport engineering for cell factories and discusses the methods for transporter identification and characterization.

Indexed as

Membrane Transport ProteinsMetabolic EngineeringMembrane Transport Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32927362
PMCPMC7758712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.