Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32927269›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2020

The effect of remote patient monitoring on the primary care clinic visit frequency among adults with type 2 diabetes.

Morgan Hampton Randall, Zachary Merle Haulsee, Jingwen Zhang, Justin Marsden, William Patrick Moran, Elizabeth Barnhardt Kirkland

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Morgan Hampton RandallDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Zachary Merle HaulseeDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Jingwen ZhangDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Section of Health Systems Research and Policy, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Justin MarsdenDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Section of Health Systems Research and Policy, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
William Patrick MoranDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Elizabeth Barnhardt KirklandDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. Electronic address: kirklane@musc.edu.
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR001450 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T., FLUME, PATRICK A · 2015 to 2024
$41.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsHealthcare organizations are increasingly using technology to assist in diabetes management based on telemedicine's proven ability to improve glycemic regulation, decrease cost, and overcome barriers to effective healthcare. Nevertheless, it remains unclear how telemedicine intersects with primary care. We aim to measure the impact of a remote monitoring program for diabetes on primary care delivery through analysis of primary care office visit frequency.

methodsPatients eligible to participate in our institution's remote diabetes monitoring program were identified and classified as enrolled or not enrolled (i.e. "usual care"). The number of scheduled and completed primary care office visits in the 12 months prior to and after the index date were measured for both groups. The index date was the enrollment date or, for the patients who received usual care, the next available enrollment session after eligibility screen. Two-sample t-tests were used to examine the change in frequency of office visits prior to and after enrollment for participants, as well as the difference in visit frequency between enrolled patients versus patients receiving usual care.

resultsThere was no statistical difference in the number of scheduled or completed primary care clinic visits before or after enrollment in telehealth. Furthermore, there was no difference in the number of scheduled or completed primary care visits between patients enrolled in telehealth versus those receiving usual care.

conclusionParticipation in telehealth has been shown to be associated with significant HbA1c reductions in prior work, yet our data suggest that remote monitoring is not associated with a change in primary care office visit frequency. This suggests that telehealth may improve diabetes management independently of primary care visits.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2TelemedicineAdultHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicOffice VisitsPrimary Health CareDiabetesPrimary careRemote patient monitoringTelehealthTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32927269
PMCPMC7688576
OpenAlexW3086195703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.