Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32926763›Full record

Observational studyCancer medicine2020

Impact of complete surgical resection on outcome in aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with immunochemotherapy.

Christine Schmitz, Jan Rekowski, Stefan P Müller, Navid Farsijani, Bernd Hertenstein, Christiane Franzius, Ulla von Verschuer, Paul La Rosée, Martin Freesmeyer, Stefan Wilop and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Christine SchmitzKlinik für Hämatologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2766-1696
Jan RekowskiInstitut für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5207-3864
Stefan P MüllerKlinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Navid FarsijaniKlinik für Hämatologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Bernd HertensteinMedizinische Klinik I, Klinikum Bremen-Mitte, Bremen, Germany.
Christiane FranziusZentrum für moderne Diagnostik (Zemodi), Zentrum für Nuklearmedizin und PET/CT, Bremen, Germany.
Ulla von VerschuerMVZ Hämatologie und Onkologie, Essen, Germany.
Paul La RoséeKlinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.
Martin FreesmeyerKlinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.
Stefan WilopKlinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie, Hämostaseologie und Stammzelltransplantation, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Thomas KrohnKlinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Aruna RaghavacharMedizinische Klinik 1, Helios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.
Arnold GanserKlinik für Hämatologie, Hämostaseologie, Onkologie und Stammzelltransplantation, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3510-4304
Frank M BengelKlinik für Nuklearmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4529-7963
Gabriele Prange-KrexOnkologische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Dresden, Germany.
Frank KroschinskyMedizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
Jörg KotzerkeKlinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
Aristoteles GiagounidisKlinik für Onkologie und Hämatologie, Helios St. Johannes Klinik, Duisburg, Germany.
Ulrich DührsenKlinik für Hämatologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4034-9472
Andreas HüttmannKlinik für Hämatologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2230-3873
Essen University Hospital · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEPraxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie · DEUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEHelios Kliniken · DEHelios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal · DEInstitut für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie · DEJena University Hospital · DEKlinikum Bremen-Mitte · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical resection is considered to be of purely diagnostic value in aggressive lymphoma. Evidence for an impact on outcome is scant and restricted to retrospective observations.

methodsIn the "Positron Emission Tomography-guided Therapy of Aggressive non-Hodgkin Lymphomas" (PETAL) trial, patients with a negative baseline positron emission tomography (PET) scan were documented in a prospective observational substudy. Baseline PET-negative patients with the absence of lymph node enlargement on computed tomography and a negative bone marrow biopsy were considered to have undergone complete lymphoma resection.

resultsEighty-two of 1,041 patients (7.9%) had a negative baseline PET scan, and 67 were included in this analysis. All were treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP), plus rituximab for CD20-positive lymphomas. Among 52 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 48 had completely resected disease. Their outcome tended to be better than that of 115 baseline PET-positive stage I DLBCL patients treated in the main part of the PETAL trial (2-year progression-free survival 92.7% [95% confidence interval 84.7-100] versus 88.4% [82.5-94.3], P = .056; 2-year overall survival 92.7% [84.7-100] versus 93.7% [89.2-98.2], P = .176), but this was restricted to patients below the age of 60 years (2-year progression-free survival 100% versus 92.2% [84.8-99.6], P = .031; 2-year overall survival 100% versus 95.9% [90.2-100], P = .075). In peripheral T-cell lymphoma, eight of 11 patients had completely resected disease. In contrast to DLBCL, complete resection was not associated with improved outcome compared to the control.

conclusionYoung patients with early stage DLBCL may benefit from complete lymphoma resection prior to immunochemotherapy.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiopsyBone Marrow ExaminationCyclophosphamideDisease ProgressionDoxorubicinFemaleGermanyHumansLymphoma, B-CellLymphoma, T-CellMaleMiddle AgedCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinPrednisoneVincristine, B-celllymphomaLymphomapositron emission tomographyprognosissurgical resection, T-cell

Identifiers

PMID32926763
PMCPMC7666729
OpenAlexW3085952183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.