Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32926755›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2021

Results of 2-Year Ring Testing of a Semifield Study Design to Investigate Potential Impacts of Plant Protection Products on the Solitary Bees Osmia Bicornis and Osmia Cornuta and a Proposal for a Suitable Test Design.

Lea Franke, Charlotte Elston, Tobias Jütte, Olaf Klein, Silvio Knäbe, Johannes Lückmann, Ivo Roessink, Markus Persigehl, Magdaléna Cornement, Nina Exeler and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Lea FrankeEurofins Agroscience Services Ecotox, Niefern-Öschelbronn, Germany.
Charlotte ElstonSyngenta, Jealott's Hill International Research Centre Bracknell, Berkshire, United Kingdom.
Tobias JütteInstitute for Bee Protection, Julius Kühn-Institut Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Messeweg, Braunschweig, Germany.
Olaf KleinEurofins Agroscience Services Ecotox, Niefern-Öschelbronn, Germany.
Silvio KnäbeEurofins Agroscience Services Ecotox, Niefern-Öschelbronn, Germany.
Johannes LückmannRifcon, Hirschberg, Germany.
Ivo RoessinkWageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0017-8282
Markus Persigehltier3 solutions, Leverkusen, Germany.
Magdaléna CornementInnovative Environmental Services, Witterswil, Switzerland.
Nina ExelerBayer CropScience, Monheim, Germany.
Hervé GiffardTestapi, Gennes, Gennes-Val-de-Loire, France.
Bettina HodappInnovative Environmental Services, Witterswil, Switzerland.
Stefan KimmelInnovative Environmental Services, Witterswil, Switzerland.
Britta Kullmanntier3 solutions, Leverkusen, Germany.
Christof SchneiderBASF, Limburgerhof, Germany.
Alexander SchnurrBioChem agrar, Gerichshain, Germany.
RLP AgroScience (Germany) · DEBayer (Germany) · DEJulius Kühn-Institut · DESyngenta (United Kingdom) · GBWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are various differences in size, behavior, and life history traits of non-Apis bee species compared with honey bees (Apis mellifera; Linnaeus, 1758). Currently, the risk assessment for bees in the international and national process of authorizing plant protection products has been based on honey bee data as a surrogate organism for non-Apis bees. To evaluate the feasibility of a semifield tunnel test for Osmia bicornis (Linnaeus, 1758) and Osmia cornuta (Latreille, 1805), a protocol was developed by the non-Apis working group of the International Commission for Plant-Pollinator Relationships, consisting of experts from authorities, academia, and industry. A total of 25 studies were performed over a 2-yr period testing a replicated control against a replicated positive control using either a dimethoate or diflubenzuron treatment. Studies were regarded to be valid, if ≥30% of released females were found to occupy the nesting units in the night/morning before the application (establishment). Thirteen studies were regarded to be valid and were analyzed further. Parameters analyzed were nest occupation, flight activity, cell production (total and per female), cocoon production (total and per female), emergence success, sex ratio, and mean weight of females and males. Dimethoate was a reliable positive control at the tested rate of 75 g a.i./ha, once >30% females had established, displaying acute effects such as reduction in flight activity, increase in adult mortality (shown by nest occupation), and reproduction ability of the females (total cell and cocoon production). On the other hand, no effects on larval and pupal development were observed. The growth regulator diflubenzuron had statistically significant effects on brood development, causing mortality of eggs and larvae at a rate of approximately 200 g a.i./ha, whereas fenoxycarb did not cause any significant effects at the tested rates of 300 and 600 g a.i./ha. In conclusion, the ring-test protocol proved to be adequate once the study comprised a well-established population of female Osmia bees, and the results improved in the second year as the laboratories increased their experience with the test organism. It is noted that the success of a study strongly depends on the experience of the experimenter, the crop quality, the quality of the cocoons, and the weather conditions. Based on these finding, recommendations for a semifield study design with Osmia spp. are proposed. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:236-250. © 2020 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

Indexed as

MagnoliopsidaReproductionAnimalsBeesEcotoxicologyLarvaEcotoxicologyNon-ApisOsmiaPesticidesRisk assessmentSemifield test design

Identifiers

PMID32926755
PMCPMC7839555
OpenAlexW3085683827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.