SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2020
Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Topical antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Antibiotics versus topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Topical versus systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Topical antibiotics with steroids for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Topical azole treatments for otomycosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Topical versus systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Topical antibiotics with steroids for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Antibiotics versus topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Topical antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Switching to dupilumab from other biologic therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSWNP): a comparison with biologic-naïve patients.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Nystagmus and Vertigo During Aural Toilet Using Microsuction.Audiology research · 2025Article
- Approach to otitis externa.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2024Review
- Tunable ciprofloxacin delivery through personalized electrospun patches for tympanic membrane perforations.Bioactive materials · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM), sometimes referred to as chronic otitis media (COM), is a chronic inflammation and often polymicrobial infection (involving more than one micro-organism) of the middle ear and mastoid cavity, characterised by ear discharge (otorrhoea) through a perforated tympanic membrane. The predominant symptoms of CSOM are ear discharge and hearing loss. Aural toileting is a term describing a number of processes for manually cleaning the ear. Techniques used may include dry mopping (with cotton wool or tissue paper), suction clearance (typically under a microscope) or irrigation (using manual or automated syringing). Dry mopping may be effective in removing mucopurulent discharge. Compared to irrigation or microsuction it is less effective in removing epithelial debris or thick pus. Aural toileting can be used alone or in addition to other treatments for CSOM, such as antibiotics or topical antiseptics.
objectivesTo assess the effects of aural toilet procedures for people with CSOM. SEARCH
methodsThe Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL via the Cochrane Register of Studies); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; CINAHL; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 16 March 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with at least a one-week follow-up involving people (adults and children) who had chronic ear discharge of unknown cause or CSOM, where the ear discharge had continued for more than two weeks. We included any aural toileting method as the intervention, at any frequency and for any duration. The comparisons were aural toileting compared with a) placebo or no intervention, and b) any other aural toileting method. We analysed trials in which background treatments were used in both arms (e.g. topical antiseptics or topical antibiotics) separately. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used the standard Cochrane methodological procedures. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. Our primary outcomes were: resolution of ear discharge or 'dry ear' (whether otoscopically confirmed or not), measured at between one week and up to two weeks, two weeks to up to four weeks, and after four weeks; health-related quality of life using a validated instrument; and ear pain (otalgia) or discomfort or local irritation. Secondary outcomes were hearing, serious complications, and the adverse events of ear bleeding and dizziness/vertigo/balance problems. MAIN
resultsWe included three studies with a total of 431 participants (465 ears), reporting on two comparisons. Two studies included only children with CSOM in the community (351 participants) and the other study (80 participants) included children and adults with chronic ear discharge for at least six weeks. None of the included studies reported the outcomes of health-related quality of life, ear pain or the adverse event of ear bleeding. Daily aural toileting (dry mopping) versus no treatment Two studies (351 children; 370 ears) compared daily dry mopping with no treatment. Neither study presented results for resolution of ear discharge at between one and up to two weeks or between two to four weeks. For resolution of ear discharge after four weeks, one study reported the results per person. We are very uncertain whether there is a difference at 16 weeks (risk ratio (RR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60 to 1.72; 1 study; 217 participants) because the certainty of the evidence is very low. No results were reported for the adverse events of dizziness, vertigo or balance problems. Only one study reported serious complications, but it was not clear which group these patients were from, or whether the complications occurred pre- or post-treatment. One study reported hearing, but the results were presented by treatment outcome rather than by treatment group so it is not possible to determine whether there is a difference between the two groups. Daily aural toileting versus single aural toileting on top of topical ciprofloxacin One study (80 participants; 95 ears) compared daily aural toileting (suction) with administration of topical antibiotic (ciprofloxacin) ear drops in a clinic, to a single aural toileting (suction) episode followed by daily self-administered topical antibiotic drops, in participants of all ages. We are unsure whether there is a difference in resolution of ear discharge at between one and up to two weeks (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.30; 1 study; 80 participants) because the certainty of the evidence is very low. There were no results reported for resolution of ear discharge at between two to four weeks. The results for resolution of ear discharge after four weeks were presented by ear, not person, and could not be adjusted to by person. One patient in the group with single aural toileting and self administration of topical antibiotic ear drops reported the adverse event of dizziness, which the authors attributed to the use of cold topical ciprofloxacin. It is very uncertain whether there is a difference between the groups (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.95; 1 study; 80 participants, very low-certainty). No results were reported for the other adverse events of vertigo or balance problems, or for serious complications. The authors only reported qualitatively that there was no difference between the two groups in hearing results (very low-certainty). AUTHORS'
conclusionsWe are very uncertain whether or not treatment with aural toileting is effective in resolving ear discharge in people with CSOM, due to a lack of data and the poor quality of the available evidence. We also remain uncertain about other outcomes, including adverse events, as these were not well reported. Similarly, we are very uncertain whether daily suction clearance, followed by antibiotic ear drops administered at a clinic, is better than a single episode of suction clearance followed by self-administration of topical antibiotic ear drops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.