Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32926406›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2020

Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media.

Mahmood F Bhutta, Karen Head, Lee-Yee Chong, Jessica Daw, Anne Gm Schilder, Martin J Burton, Christopher G Brennan-Jones

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 15 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Topical antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Antibiotics versus topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Topical versus systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  6. Topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  7. Topical antibiotics with steroids for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  8. Topical azole treatments for otomycosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  9. Topical versus systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  10. Systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  11. Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  12. Topical antibiotics with steroids for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  13. Antibiotics versus topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  14. Topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  15. Topical antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  16. Switching to dupilumab from other biologic therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSWNP): a comparison with biologic-naïve patients.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Approach to otitis externa.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mahmood F BhuttaDepartment of Otolaryngology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK.
Karen HeadCochrane ENT, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lee-Yee ChongNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jessica DawTelethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Anne Gm SchilderevidENT, Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Martin J BurtonCochrane UK, Oxford, UK.
Christopher G Brennan-JonesTelethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
The Kids Research Institute Australia · AUUniversity of Oxford · GBCochrane · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-011-045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM), sometimes referred to as chronic otitis media (COM), is a chronic inflammation and often polymicrobial infection (involving more than one micro-organism) of the middle ear and mastoid cavity, characterised by ear discharge (otorrhoea) through a perforated tympanic membrane. The predominant symptoms of CSOM are ear discharge and hearing loss. Aural toileting is a term describing a number of processes for manually cleaning the ear. Techniques used may include dry mopping (with cotton wool or tissue paper), suction clearance (typically under a microscope) or irrigation (using manual or automated syringing). Dry mopping may be effective in removing mucopurulent discharge. Compared to irrigation or microsuction it is less effective in removing epithelial debris or thick pus. Aural toileting can be used alone or in addition to other treatments for CSOM, such as antibiotics or topical antiseptics.

objectivesTo assess the effects of aural toilet procedures for people with CSOM. SEARCH

methodsThe Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL via the Cochrane Register of Studies); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; CINAHL; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 16 March 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with at least a one-week follow-up involving people (adults and children) who had chronic ear discharge of unknown cause or CSOM, where the ear discharge had continued for more than two weeks. We included any aural toileting method as the intervention, at any frequency and for any duration. The comparisons were aural toileting compared with a) placebo or no intervention, and b) any other aural toileting method. We analysed trials in which background treatments were used in both arms (e.g. topical antiseptics or topical antibiotics) separately. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used the standard Cochrane methodological procedures. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. Our primary outcomes were: resolution of ear discharge or 'dry ear' (whether otoscopically confirmed or not), measured at between one week and up to two weeks, two weeks to up to four weeks, and after four weeks; health-related quality of life using a validated instrument; and ear pain (otalgia) or discomfort or local irritation. Secondary outcomes were hearing, serious complications, and the adverse events of ear bleeding and dizziness/vertigo/balance problems. MAIN

resultsWe included three studies with a total of 431 participants (465 ears), reporting on two comparisons. Two studies included only children with CSOM in the community (351 participants) and the other study (80 participants) included children and adults with chronic ear discharge for at least six weeks. None of the included studies reported the outcomes of health-related quality of life, ear pain or the adverse event of ear bleeding. Daily aural toileting (dry mopping) versus no treatment Two studies (351 children; 370 ears) compared daily dry mopping with no treatment. Neither study presented results for resolution of ear discharge at between one and up to two weeks or between two to four weeks. For resolution of ear discharge after four weeks, one study reported the results per person. We are very uncertain whether there is a difference at 16 weeks (risk ratio (RR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60 to 1.72; 1 study; 217 participants) because the certainty of the evidence is very low. No results were reported for the adverse events of dizziness, vertigo or balance problems. Only one study reported serious complications, but it was not clear which group these patients were from, or whether the complications occurred pre- or post-treatment. One study reported hearing, but the results were presented by treatment outcome rather than by treatment group so it is not possible to determine whether there is a difference between the two groups. Daily aural toileting versus single aural toileting on top of topical ciprofloxacin One study (80 participants; 95 ears) compared daily aural toileting (suction) with administration of topical antibiotic (ciprofloxacin) ear drops in a clinic, to a single aural toileting (suction) episode followed by daily self-administered topical antibiotic drops, in participants of all ages. We are unsure whether there is a difference in resolution of ear discharge at between one and up to two weeks (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.30; 1 study; 80 participants) because the certainty of the evidence is very low. There were no results reported for resolution of ear discharge at between two to four weeks. The results for resolution of ear discharge after four weeks were presented by ear, not person, and could not be adjusted to by person. One patient in the group with single aural toileting and self administration of topical antibiotic ear drops reported the adverse event of dizziness, which the authors attributed to the use of cold topical ciprofloxacin. It is very uncertain whether there is a difference between the groups (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.95; 1 study; 80 participants, very low-certainty). No results were reported for the other adverse events of vertigo or balance problems, or for serious complications. The authors only reported qualitatively that there was no difference between the two groups in hearing results (very low-certainty). AUTHORS'

conclusionsWe are very uncertain whether or not treatment with aural toileting is effective in resolving ear discharge in people with CSOM, due to a lack of data and the poor quality of the available evidence. We also remain uncertain about other outcomes, including adverse events, as these were not well reported. Similarly, we are very uncertain whether daily suction clearance, followed by antibiotic ear drops administered at a clinic, is better than a single episode of suction clearance followed by self-administration of topical antibiotic ear drops.

Indexed as

HygieneAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiasChildChronic DiseaseCiprofloxacinHumansOtitis Media, SuppurativeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSuctionTime FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacin

Identifiers

PMID32926406
PMCPMC8095014
OpenAlexW2809004855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.