Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32926356›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2020

The Potential Teratogenicity Alert for Women Conceiving on Dolutegravir-Based Regimens: An Assessment of Risk Communication by an Urban HIV Clinic in Uganda and Choices made by Women.

Eva Agnes Odongpiny Laker, Arnold Arinaitwe, Noela Owarwo, Annet Onzia, Benson Nasasira, Abdullah Wailagala, Ivan Kalule, Godwin Anguzu, Agnes Kiragga, Kay Seden and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eva Agnes Odongpiny LakerInfectious Disease Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 22418, Kampala, Uganda. elaker@idi.co.ug.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7937-1538
Arnold ArinaitweInfectious Disease Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 22418, Kampala, Uganda.
Noela OwarwoInfectious Disease Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 22418, Kampala, Uganda.
Annet OnziaInfectious Disease Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 22418, Kampala, Uganda.
Benson NasasiraInfectious Disease Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 22418, Kampala, Uganda.
Abdullah WailagalaInfectious Disease Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 22418, Kampala, Uganda.
Ivan KaluleInfectious Disease Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 22418, Kampala, Uganda.
Godwin AnguzuInfectious Disease Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 22418, Kampala, Uganda.
Agnes KiraggaInfectious Disease Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 22418, Kampala, Uganda.
Kay SedenUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Isaac LwangaInfectious Disease Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 22418, Kampala, Uganda.
Barbara CastelnuovoInfectious Disease Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 22418, Kampala, Uganda.
Rachel MusombaInfectious Disease Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 22418, Kampala, Uganda.
Mohammed LamordeInfectious Disease Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 22418, Kampala, Uganda.
Makerere University · UGUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND

objectiveIn May 2018, the World Health Organization and other regulatory authorities released a safety alert for dolutegravir related to a risk of neural tube defects among women exposed to dolutegravir at the time of conception. Models of how drug safety information can be shared effectively in the shortest time are necessary to prevent interruptions of public health programs. We sought to describe an implementation process to inform and support women already on dolutegravir-based regimens at the time of conception to make informed choices following the safety alert of a potential teratogenicity risk. We describe the choices made by women, as well as determine the factors associated with women's choices to switch off dolutegravir.

methodsA clinic response plan was developed in the first week following the alert and clinic staff were trained on safety guidance. All women aged < 55 years taking dolutegravir were identified from the clinic database and contacted by phone for earlier appointments. Non-menopausal and non-surgically sterilized women were referred for urine pregnancy testing and evaluation of pregnancy intentions in the following 12 months and effective family planning was offered. We describe the coverage of women who received the communication as well as the fidelity to the outlined plan from 21 May to 12 September, 2018. We used modified a Poisson regression analysis to determine factors associated with switching off dolutegravir.

resultsOf all active patients in the clinic, 9% (690/7963) were identified as female aged < 55 years taking dolutegravir. Ninety-five percent (656/690) were reviewed by September 2018 and informed of the safety alert, implying a high level of uptake. Fidelity to standard operating procedures was also high at 72%. Twenty-two percent (146/656) of patients were menopausal or surgically sterilized. Five hundred and ten women were of reproductive potential with a median age (interquartile range) of 37 years (30-42 years). Five percent (23/510) were human chorionic gonadotrophin positive and all initial ultrasound reports revealed no deformities. Twenty-one percent (108/510) had intentions to conceive and opted to stop taking dolutegravir with 90% (97/108) switching to efavirenz. Seventy-nine percent (402/510) opted to remain taking dolutegravir. However, only 40% (160/402) chose effective contraceptive methods and 60% (242/402) opted for condoms only/no contraceptive method.

conclusionsA rapid well-coordinated response ensured prompt communication of the dolutegravir safety warning. The process developed by the clinic can act as a model for response during drug safety alerts. Women made informed decisions with most opting to remain taking dolutegravir; however, effective contraception uptake was low.

Indexed as

Abnormalities, Drug-InducedHIV-1AdultAnti-HIV AgentsChoice BehaviorContraceptionDolutegravirFemaleHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHIV InfectionsHumansOxazinesPiperazinesPregnancyPyridonesUgandaAnti-HIV AgentsDolutegravirHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingOxazinesPiperazinesPyridones

Identifiers

PMID32926356
OpenAlexW3084760442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.