Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32926251›Full record

ReviewSurgical endoscopy2021

The current state of robotic retromuscular repairs-a qualitative review of the literature.

David A Santos, Angela R Limmer, Heather M Gibson, Celia R Ledet

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Robotic Surgical Procedures for Ventral Hernia Repair.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Long term outcomes of robotic-assisted abdominal wall reconstruction: a single surgeon experience.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David A SantosDepartment of Surgical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, FCT 17.6004, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, USA. dasantos@mdanderson.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7636-7077
Angela R LimmerDepartment of Surgical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, FCT 17.6004, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, USA.
Heather M GibsonDepartment of Surgical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, FCT 17.6004, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, USA.
Celia R LedetDepartment of Surgical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, FCT 17.6004, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe management of ventral incisional hernias (VIH) has undergone many iterations over the last 5 years due to evolution in surgical techniques and advancement in robotic surgery. Four general principles have emerged: mesh usage, retromuscular mesh placement, primary fascial closure, and usage of minimally invasive techniques when possible. The application of robotic retromuscular repairs in VIH allow these principles to be applied simultaneously. This qualitative review attempts to answer what robotic retromuscular repairs are described, which patients are selected for these techniques, and what are current outcomes.

methodsUsing the key words: "robotic retromuscular repair", "robotic Rives Stoppa", and "robotic transversus abdominis release", a PubMed search of articles written up to December 2019 was critically reviewed.

results44 articles were encountered, 9 high-quality articles were analyzed for this manuscript. Level of evidence ranged from 2B to 2C. Robotic TAR patients had BMI of 33 kg/m

conclusionIn short-term follow-up, robotic retromuscular repairs show promise that VIH can be repaired with intramuscular mesh, few complications, and shorter LOS. Data on hernia recurrence, long-term complications, and rigorous cost analysis are needed to demonstrate generalizability.

Indexed as

Abdominal MusclesFemaleHernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyHumansIncisional HerniaLaparoscopyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomeETEPRobotic retromuscularTARVentral hernia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.