Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32926230›Full record

ReviewHistochemistry and cell biology2020

Zebrafish cardiac regeneration-looking beyond cardiomyocytes to a complex microenvironment.

Rebecca Ryan, Bethany R Moyse, Rebecca J Richardson

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Zebrafish in Cardiovascular Disease Research: from Model to Application.International journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. ptx3aCell reports · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Genome Editing and Cardiac Regeneration.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Immune cells in cardiac repair and regeneration.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Introduction: in vivo cell biology in zebrafish.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecca RyanC21a, Biomedical Sciences Building, Faculty of Life Sciences, School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK.
Bethany R MoyseC21a, Biomedical Sciences Building, Faculty of Life Sciences, School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK.
Rebecca J RichardsonC21a, Biomedical Sciences Building, Faculty of Life Sciences, School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK. rebecca.richardson@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4701-8713
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/15/2/31225British Heart Foundation RM/17/2/33380Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 108907/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of heart repair post-myocardial infarction has historically focused on the importance of cardiomyocyte proliferation as the major factor limiting adult mammalian heart regeneration. However, there is mounting evidence that a narrow focus on this one cell type discounts the importance of a complex cascade of cell-cell communication involving a whole host of different cell types. A major difficulty in the study of heart regeneration is the rarity of this process in adult animals, meaning a mammalian template for how this can be achieved is lacking. Here, we review the adult zebrafish as an ideal and unique model in which to study the underlying mechanisms and cell types required to attain complete heart regeneration following cardiac injury. We provide an introduction to the role of the cardiac microenvironment in the complex regenerative process and discuss some of the key advances using this in vivo vertebrate model that have recently increased our understanding of the vital roles of multiple different cell types. Due to the sheer number of exciting studies describing new and unexpected roles for inflammatory cell populations in cardiac regeneration, this review will pay particular attention to these important microenvironment participants.

Indexed as

RegenerationZebrafishAnimalsCellular MicroenvironmentDisease Models, AnimalHeartMyocytes, CardiacCardiomyocytesHeart regenerationImmune cellsMicroenvironmentZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID32926230
PMCPMC7609419
OpenAlexW3082077679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.