Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32926222›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2020

Error propagation analysis of seven partial volume correction algorithms for [

Senri Oyama, Ayumu Hosoi, Masanobu Ibaraki, Colm J McGinnity, Keisuke Matsubara, Shoichi Watanuki, Hiroshi Watabe, Manabu Tashiro, Miho Shidahara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of meningeal uptake and partial volume correction techniques on [Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Senri OyamaDivision of Cyclotron Nuclear Medicine, Cyclotron and Radioisotope Center, Sendai, Japan.
Ayumu HosoiDivision of Applied Quantum Medical Engineering, Department of Quantum Science and Energy Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Masanobu IbarakiDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Research Institute for Brain and Blood Vessels, Akita Cerebrospinal and Cardiovascular Center, Akita, Japan.
Colm J McGinnitySchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Keisuke MatsubaraDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Research Institute for Brain and Blood Vessels, Akita Cerebrospinal and Cardiovascular Center, Akita, Japan.
Shoichi WatanukiDivision of Cyclotron Nuclear Medicine, Cyclotron and Radioisotope Center, Sendai, Japan.
Hiroshi WatabeDivision of Radiation Protection and Safety Control, Cyclotron and Radioisotope Center, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Manabu TashiroDivision of Cyclotron Nuclear Medicine, Cyclotron and Radioisotope Center, Sendai, Japan.
Miho ShidaharaDivision of Cyclotron Nuclear Medicine, Cyclotron and Radioisotope Center, Sendai, Japan. miho.shidahara.c2@tohoku.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3647-2299

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EPSRCMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology No. 15K08687Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology No 17H04118Wellcome Trust 203148/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust WT 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNovel partial volume correction (PVC) algorithms have been validated by assuming ideal conditions of image processing; however, in real clinical PET studies, the input datasets include error sources which cause error propagation to the corrected outcome.

methodsWe aimed to evaluate error propagations of seven PVCs algorithms for brain PET imaging with [

resultsUncorrected SUVRs were underestimated against true SUVRs (- 15.7 and - 53.7% in hippocampus for HC and AD conditions), and application of each PVC algorithm reduced the %diff. Larger FWHM mismatch led to larger %diff of PVC-SUVRs against true SUVRs for all algorithms. Inaccurate image registration showed systematic propagation for most algorithms except for SFS-RR and modified SFS-RR. Incorrect segmentation of the anatomical volume only resulted in error propagations in limited local regions.

conclusionsWe demonstrated error propagation by numerical simulation of THK-PET imaging. Error propagations of 7 PVC algorithms for brain PET imaging with [

Indexed as

[18F]THK-5351Brain PETError-propagation analysisPartial volume correction

Identifiers

PMID32926222
PMCPMC7490288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.