ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2021
Does microenema administration improve the quality of DWI sequences in rectal MRI?
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and evaluation of a cervical cancer-specific restriction spectrum imaging (RSI) model.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2026Article
- MRI to guide clinical management of rectal cancer: updated consensus recommendations from the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): PART II-Restaging and response evaluation.European radiology · 2026Article
- MRI to guide clinical management of rectal cancer: updated consensus recommendations from the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR)-PART I primary staging.European radiology · 2026Article
- Challenges in rectal cancer MRI: from image acquisition to interpretation.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- The Role of MRI in Non-Operative Management of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Review
- Bisacodyl micro-enema before MRI of rectal tumors: effects on rectum, image quality and patient acceptance.European radiology · 2026Article
- Diffusion-weighted imaging in rectal cancer MRI from theory to practice.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- MRI of early rectal cancer; bisacodyl micro-enema increases submucosal width, reader confidence, and tumor conspicuity.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Micro-enema immediately prior to prostate MRI: effects on rectal gas, image quality and PI-QUAL score.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Mastering rectal cancer MRI: From foundational concepts to optimal staging.European journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Roles of MRI evaluation of pelvic recurrence in patients with rectal cancer.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- Watch & wait - Post neoadjuvant imaging for rectal cancer.Clinical imaging · 2024Review
- PET/MRI in colorectal and anal cancers: an update.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Review
- Staging of Cervical Cancer: A Practical Approach Using MRI and FDG PET.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2023Review
- The optimized rectal cancer MRI protocol: choosing the right sequences, sequence parameters, and preparatory strategies.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Review
- Radiologic T staging of colon cancer: renewed interest for clinical practice.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Review
- A primer on rectal MRI in patients on watch-and-wait treatment for rectal cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Review
- Watch-and-Wait Approach to Rectal Cancer: The Role of Imaging.Radiology · 2023Review
- Rectal MRI Interpretation After Neoadjuvant Therapy.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023Review
- The importance of MRI for rectal cancer evaluation.Surgical oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo determine whether the administration of a microenema immediately prior to rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) decreases the level of gas-related artifacts on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences.
methodsThis retrospective analysis included 492 (183 baseline and 309 post-total neoadjuvant treatment [TNT]) consecutive MRI scans for rectal cancer from January 2019 to January 2020. Scan-related factors were identified including microenema use (yes or no), field of view (FOV) in DWI (b = 800 or b = 1500), and magnet strength (1.5 T or 3 T). Two readers scored DWI studies for gas-related artifacts and T2-weighted sequences for the amount of intraluminal gas on a 5-point scale. Fisher's exact test and the Rao-Scott Chi-squared test were used to examine associations between microenema use and other factors. Generalized estimating equation and multivariable regression models were performed to examine the effect of microenema use in subgroups of scans for each reader. Cohen's κ was used to assess inter-reader agreement.
resultsGas-related artifact levels decreased in scans with microenema overall (P < 0.001) as well as when scans were stratified by FOV (P ≤ 0.003). For both readers, post-TNT scans with microenema showed lower artifact levels overall (P < 0.014 and P < 0.001) and in post-TNT subgroups of axial DWI scans (P ≤ 0.006 and P < 0.001) and scans acquired with a 3 T magnet (P ≤ 0.001 for both FOV). No evidence of decreased artifact level was found for baseline studies. Decreased gas was seen with microenema use (P < 0.001 for both readers). Inter-reader agreement on artifact-level and gas-level assessments ranged from slight to substantial (κ = 0.273-0.685).
conclusionMicroenema use prior to rectal MRI reduces gas-related artifacts on DWI, including both large and small FOV sequences and particularly on post-TNT scans performed at 3 T, and offers a viable solution to improve DWI quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.