Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32926212›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2021

Does microenema administration improve the quality of DWI sequences in rectal MRI?

Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam, Sidra Javed-Tayyab, Natalie Gangai, Junting Zheng, Marinela Capanu, David D B Bates, James L Fuqua, Viktoriya Paroder, Jennifer Golia-Pernicka, Marc J Gollub and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. PET/MRI in colorectal and anal cancers: an update.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Rectal MRI Interpretation After Neoadjuvant Therapy.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam *Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Sidra Javed-Tayyab *Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Natalie GangaiDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Junting ZhengDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Cencer, New York, NY, USA.
Marinela CapanuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Cencer, New York, NY, USA.
David D B BatesDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
James L FuquaDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Viktoriya ParoderDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Jennifer Golia-PernickaDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Marc J GollubDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Iva PetkovskaDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA. petkovsi@mskcc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4373-6494
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether the administration of a microenema immediately prior to rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) decreases the level of gas-related artifacts on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences.

methodsThis retrospective analysis included 492 (183 baseline and 309 post-total neoadjuvant treatment [TNT]) consecutive MRI scans for rectal cancer from January 2019 to January 2020. Scan-related factors were identified including microenema use (yes or no), field of view (FOV) in DWI (b = 800 or b = 1500), and magnet strength (1.5 T or 3 T). Two readers scored DWI studies for gas-related artifacts and T2-weighted sequences for the amount of intraluminal gas on a 5-point scale. Fisher's exact test and the Rao-Scott Chi-squared test were used to examine associations between microenema use and other factors. Generalized estimating equation and multivariable regression models were performed to examine the effect of microenema use in subgroups of scans for each reader. Cohen's κ was used to assess inter-reader agreement.

resultsGas-related artifact levels decreased in scans with microenema overall (P < 0.001) as well as when scans were stratified by FOV (P ≤ 0.003). For both readers, post-TNT scans with microenema showed lower artifact levels overall (P < 0.014 and P < 0.001) and in post-TNT subgroups of axial DWI scans (P ≤ 0.006 and P < 0.001) and scans acquired with a 3 T magnet (P ≤ 0.001 for both FOV). No evidence of decreased artifact level was found for baseline studies. Decreased gas was seen with microenema use (P < 0.001 for both readers). Inter-reader agreement on artifact-level and gas-level assessments ranged from slight to substantial (κ = 0.273-0.685).

conclusionMicroenema use prior to rectal MRI reduces gas-related artifacts on DWI, including both large and small FOV sequences and particularly on post-TNT scans performed at 3 T, and offers a viable solution to improve DWI quality.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingRectal NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRectumRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityDiffusion-weighted imagingMagnetic resonance imagingMicroenemaRectal neoplasmsSusceptibility artifact

Identifiers

PMID32926212
PMCPMC7946648
OpenAlexW3084816882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.