Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32925939›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Population genomics of louping ill virus provide new insights into the evolution of tick-borne flaviviruses.

Jordan J Clark, Janice Gilray, Richard J Orton, Margaret Baird, Gavin Wilkie, Ana da Silva Filipe, Nicholas Johnson, Colin J McInnes, Alain Kohl, Roman Biek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microorganisms inInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jordan J ClarkMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1790-7883
Janice GilrayMoredun Research Institute, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Richard J OrtonMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3389-4325
Margaret BairdMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Gavin WilkieMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Ana da Silva FilipeMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9442-2903
Nicholas JohnsonAnimal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Colin J McInnesMoredun Research Institute, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1465-9901
Alain KohlMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Roman BiekInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine - University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
MRC University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research · GBMoredun Research Institute · GBAnimal and Plant Health Agency · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J013854/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12014/12Medical Research Council MC_UU_12014/8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence and spread of tick-borne arboviruses pose an increased challenge to human and animal health. In Europe this is demonstrated by the increasingly wide distribution of tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV, Flavivirus, Flaviviridae), which has recently been found in the United Kingdom (UK). However, much less is known about other tick-borne flaviviruses (TBFV), such as the closely related louping ill virus (LIV), an animal pathogen which is endemic to the UK and Ireland, but which has been detected in other parts of Europe including Scandinavia and Russia. The emergence and potential spatial overlap of these viruses necessitates improved understanding of LIV genomic diversity, geographic spread and evolutionary history. We sequenced a virus archive composed of 22 LIV isolates which had been sampled throughout the UK over a period of over 80 years. Combining this dataset with published virus sequences, we detected no sign of recombination and found low diversity and limited evidence for positive selection in the LIV genome. Phylogenetic analysis provided evidence of geographic clustering as well as long-distance movement, including movement events that appear recent. However, despite genomic data and an 80-year time span, we found that the data contained insufficient temporal signal to reliably estimate a molecular clock rate for LIV. Additional analyses revealed that this also applied to TBEV, albeit to a lesser extent, pointing to a general problem with phylogenetic dating for TBFV. The 22 LIV genomes generated during this study provide a more reliable LIV phylogeny, improving our knowledge of the evolution of tick-borne flaviviruses. Our inability to estimate a molecular clock rate for both LIV and TBEV suggests that temporal calibration of tick-borne flavivirus evolution should be interpreted with caution and highlight a unique aspect of these viruses which may be explained by their reliance on tick vectors.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, ViralAnimalsCell LineCricetinaeEncephalitis, Tick-BorneEncephalitis Viruses, Tick-BorneGenetics, PopulationMetagenomicsPhylogenySequence Analysis, RNASheepUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID32925939
PMCPMC7515184
OpenAlexW3086312928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.