Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32925862›Full record

ArticleOtology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology2020

Immune Response of Macrophage Population to Cochlear Implantation: Cochlea Immune Cells.

Kathryn Y Noonan, Ivan A Lopez, Gail Ishiyama, Akira Ishiyama

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Cochlear Implant Electrode Impedance in Standard and Dexamethasone-Eluting Electrode Arrays.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Genetic polymorphisms in human CXJournal of neuroinflammation · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Editorial: Neuroimmunology of the Inner Ear.Frontiers in neurology · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathryn Y NoonanTufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ivan A LopezUniversity of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Gail IshiyamaUniversity of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Akira IshiyamaUniversity of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
University of California, Los Angeles · USTufts Medical Center · US

Funding

The Human Temporal Bone Laboratory Resource for Basic and Applied Inner Ear SciencesU24DC015910 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ISHIYAMA, AKIRA · 2017 to 2022
$4.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS U24 DC015910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

hypothesisThe presence and distribution of ionized calcium binding adaptor 1 and CD68 macrophages in the human cochlea is altered in cochlear implantation (CI) compared with the normative or nonimplanted cochlea.

backgroundIt has been hypothesized that CI induces an immunological response in macrophages leading to implant failure or reduced hearing. Macrophages are resident immune cells in human cochlea and have been shown to phagocytize implant material. In animal models, macrophage populations increase with surgical stress and with the introduction of a foreign body. However, the function and response of inner ear macrophages to CI are only beginning to be understood. This study seeks to investigate the inflammatory response to CI by comparing cochlear macrophages in implanted and nonimplanted human temporal bones.

methodsNineteen temporal bones from nine implanted ears, seven contralateral controls, and three normal control ears were evaluated for the presence and distribution of CD68 and Iba1 expressing positive macrophages.

resultsThree types of macrophage populations were detected 1) CD68 positive macrophages, 2) Iba1 positive macrophages, and 3) CD68 and Iba1 colocalizing macrophages. Macrophage distribution was ubiquitous: the stria vascularis, Rosenthal canal, and the mid-modiolus intermingled in the spiral ganglia. Iba1 and CD68 macrophages were found in the CI and non-CI contralateral and normal human cochlea. Most ionized calcium binding adaptor 1 expressing macrophages were ramified/amoeboid cells, while CD68 expressing macrophages were round shaped with foamy appearance in some areas. In the CI cochlea, both types of macrophages were detected in the fibrous sheath surrounding the CI path and within fibrotic areas within the scala tympani and the scala vestibuli in the case of CI translocation. In four cases, the density of macrophages was unchanged in the CI compared with the contralateral nonimplanted side, and in three cases, there was an increased number of macrophages in the implanted CI side compared with the nonimplanted side.

conclusionMultiple populations of macrophages exist within the cochlea which are present at baseline and in response to trauma from CI. These results further support evidence for a macrophage response to cochlear implantation. Further studies are indicated to evaluate whether these macrophages have a beneficial, detrimental, or a mixed effect in CI patients.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsAnimalsCochleaHumansImmunityMacrophagesScala TympaniTemporal Bone

Identifiers

PMID32925862
PMCPMC7855504
OpenAlexW3046293793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.