SynthesisMedicine2020
The prognostic value of tumor architecture in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular classification and diagnostics of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.Cancer cell · 2021Article
- The Prognostic Impact of Tumor Architecture for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThere is a lack of consensus regarding the prognostic value of tumor architecture (sessile vs. papillary) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The aim of the present study was to analyze the current evidence regarding the prognostic role of tumor architecture in patients undergoing RNU for UTUC through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
methodsAccording to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases was performed for citations published prior to February 2020. Cumulative analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were conducted for the survival outcomes by Stata 12.0 software.
resultsWe retrieved 17 studies (including 8,146 patients) evaluating the effect of tumor architecture on oncologic outcomes in patients treated with RNU. According to our final results, sessile tumor architecture had a significant correlation with worse cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.31-1.55, P < .001), overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.24-1.58, P < .001), recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.35-1.53, P < .001), and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.11-1.45, P = 0.001). The funnel plot test indicated that there was no significant publication bias in the meta-analysis. Besides, the findings of this study were found to be reliable by our sensitivity and subgroup analysis.
conclusionsSessile tumor architecture correlates with a significantly worse survival outcome compared with papillary tumor architecture, and it can be used as a valuable biomarker for monitoring prognoses of UTUC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.