Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32925766›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2020

The impact of anastomotic leakage on oncology after curative anterior resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lushun Ma, Xinyuan Pang, Guofeng Ji, Haojie Sun, Qihao Fan, Chong Ma

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Intraoperative adverse events as a risk factor for local recurrence of rectal cancer after resection surgery.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Lushun MaDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University.
Xinyuan PangDepartment of Neurology and Neuroscience Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Guofeng JiDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University.
Haojie SunDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University.
Qihao FanDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University.
Chong MaDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University.ORCID 0000-0002-9505-0726
Jilin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious clinical complication after anterior resection for rectal cancer and will lead to an increase in postoperative mortality. However, the effect on long-term oncology outcomes remains controversial.

methodsWe searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases for related articles. The included studies assessed local recurrence, distant recurrence, overall survival, cancer-specific survival and disease-free survival. The systematic reviews and meta-analyses was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The combined RRs with 95% CI were then calculated using a fixed effects model or a randomized effect model.

resultsA total of 18 cohort studies included 34,487 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis demonstrated that AL was associated with increased local recurrence (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.14-1.90, I = 57.8%). Anastomotic leakage decreased overall survival (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.88-0.96, I = 58.1%), cancer-specific survival (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-1.00, I = 30.4%), and disease-free survival (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.94, I = 80.4%). Distant recurrence may had no significant effects of AL (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.91-1.46, I = 58.4%).

conclusionAL has a negative effect on local recurrence and long-term survival (including overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and disease-free survival) after anterior resection for rectal cancer, but not related to distant recurrence.

Indexed as

Anastomotic LeakHumansRectal NeoplasmsSurvival RateTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32925766
PMCPMC7489661
OpenAlexW3085621089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.