ArticleMedicine2020
Diagnostic value of the enhancement intensity and enhancement pattern of CESM to benign and malignant breast lesions.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Findings of suspicious calcifications on contrast-enhanced mammography and their pathological correlation.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Article
- Improving the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced mammography through lesion conspicuity and enhancement quantification.European radiology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic value of qualitative and quantitative enhancement parameters on contrast-enhanced mammographyDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2024Article
- Contrast Enhanced Mammography (CEM) Enhancing Asymmetry: Single-Center First Case Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Radiomic Features Applied to Contrast Enhancement Spectral Mammography: Possibility to Predict Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes in a Non-Invasive Manner.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography without and with a delayed image for diagnosing malignancy among mass lesions in dense breast.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to improve the diagnostic accuracy of breast diseases by combining breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) with the enhancement intensity and pattern of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) (this combination of BI-RADS and CESM was designated as BaC).BI-RADS was used to evaluate low-energy CESM images. Spearman nonparametric correlation analysis was performed to analyze the correlation between the enhancement intensity of CESM subtraction images and the pathological results. Odds ratio (OR) values were calculated to determine whether the enhancement pattern of CESM subtraction images is a risk factor for benign and malignant lesions. The diagnostic efficacies of BI-RADS, CESM, and BaC scores for benign and malignant breast diseases were analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Lesions with a high enhancement intensity were more likely to be malignant than those with low enhancement intensity. Lesions with heterogeneous enhancement tended to be malignant, whereas those with homogeneous enhancement tended to be benign. No significant correlation was observed between ring enhancement and the benignity or malignancy of lesions. The area under the ROC curve of BaC was higher than that of BI-RADS or CESM, and the difference was statistically significant.The diagnostic efficacy of BI-RADS combined with CESM enhancement was superior to that of either method alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.