Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32925634›Full record

Trial reportObstetrics and gynecology2020

Customized Probability of Vaginal Delivery With Induction of Labor and Expectant Management in Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation.

Robert M Silver, Madeline Murguia Rice, William A Grobman, Uma M Reddy, Alan T N Tita, Gail Mallett, Kim Hill, Elizabeth A Thom, Yasser Y El-Sayed, Ronald J Wapner and 12 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01990612 (Induction in Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks to Prevent Adverse Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01990612 nacompletednot on this map

Induction in Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks to Prevent Adverse Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe George Washington University Biostatistics CenterRan2014 to 2018Enrolled6,106ConditionsLabor and DeliveryArmsElective Induction of Labor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. External validation of calculator for cesarean delivery during induction of labor.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. The rising tide: Trends in induction of labor at term over a 5-year period at a single centre.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert M SilverDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, Stanford University, Stanford, California, Columbia University, New York, New York, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston-Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, MetroHealth Medical Center-Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC; and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland.
Madeline Murguia Rice
William A Grobman
Uma M Reddy
Alan T N Tita
Gail Mallett
Kim Hill
Elizabeth A Thom
Yasser Y El-Sayed
Ronald J Wapner
Dwight J Rouse
George R Saade
John M Thorp
Suneet P Chauhan
Edward K Chien
Brian M Casey
Ronald S Gibbs
Sindhu K Srinivas
Geeta K Swamy
Hyagriv N Simhan
George A Macones
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network*
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

Data Coord Ctr-NICHD Cooperative Multicenter Maternal Medicine Units Research NetU10HD036801 · NICHD · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CLIFTON, REBECCA GERSNOVIEZ · 2009 to 2021
$174.2M
Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001873 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI REILLY, MUREDACH P · 2016 to 2025
$99.0M
SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Pregnancy RegistryU24HD036801 · NICHD · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Rebecca Gersnoviez Clifton · 2021 to 2026
$39.2M
MATERNAL FETAL RESEARCH NETWORK: DATA COORDINATING CTRU01HD036801 · NICHD · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI THOM, ELIZABETH ANN · 1998 to 2008
$27.0M
NICHD Maternal Fetal Medicine Units NetworkU10HD034116 · NICHD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI CASEY, BRIAN M · 1996 to 2015
$19.3M
NICHD Maternal Fetal Medicine Units NetworkU10HD034208 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI VARNER, MICHAEL W. · 1996 to 2015
$16.6M
NICHD Maternal Fetal Medicine Units NetworkU10HD027869 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI TITA, ALAN THEVENET N. · 1991 to 2015
$12.8M
NICHD Maternal Fetal Medicine Units NetworkU10HD040485 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WAPNER, RONALD · 2001 to 2015
$12.5M
NICHD Maternal Fetal Medicine Units NetworkU10HD040560 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI THORP, JOHN M · 2001 to 2015
$10.3M
NICHD Maternal Fetal Medicine Units NetworkU10HD040512 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GROBMAN, WILLIAM ADAM · 2001 to 2015
$8.7M
NICHD Maternal Fetal Medicine Units NetworkU10HD027915 · NICHD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI IAMS, JAY · 1992 to 2015
$7.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001873NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD036801NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD027869NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD027915NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD034116NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD034208NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD036801NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD040485NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD040500NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD040512NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD040544NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD040545NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD040560NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD053097NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD068258NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD068268NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD068282NICHD NIH HHS U24 HD036801NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD027869NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD027915NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD034116NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD034208NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD040485NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD040500NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD040512NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD040544NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD040545NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD040560NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD053097NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD068258NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD068268NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD068282NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD087192NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD087230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop models to predict vaginal delivery in low-risk, nulliparous women contemplating elective induction of labor or expectant management at 39 weeks of gestation.

methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of planned elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation compared with expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women. Two groups were included for this analysis: 1) women who were randomized to the induction of labor group and underwent elective induction at 39 0/7-39 4/7 weeks of gestation and 2) women who were randomized to the expectant management group who experienced spontaneous labor or medically indicated delivery (including postterm). Multivariable logistic regression models were developed for each group using patient characteristics that would be available at the time of counseling. Model selection was based on k-fold cross-validation using backward elimination and variables that remained significant at P<.05 were retained. To compare estimated with observed rates, the elective induction of labor model was then applied to each woman in both groups to estimate individualized predicted probabilities of vaginal delivery with elective induction of labor.

resultsOf 6,106 women enrolled in the trial, 4,661 met criteria for this analysis. Vaginal delivery occurred in 80.6% of the 2,153 women in the elective induction of labor group and 77.2% of the 2,508 women in the expectant management group (P=.005). The final elective induction of labor model included age, height, weight, and modified Bishop score (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.72, 95% CI 0.70-0.75). The same variables were included in the final expectant management model (AUROC 0.70, 95% CI 0.67-0.72). Across the range of predicted probability deciles derived from the elective induction of labor model, almost all women who underwent elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation had a higher observed chance of vaginal delivery than expectant management.

conclusionIrrespective of the individual predicted chance of vaginal delivery from elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation, vaginal delivery is generally more frequent if elective induction of labor is undertaken rather than expectant management. These data can be used to counsel nulliparous women regarding their "customized" chances of vaginal delivery as they choose between elective induction of labor or expectant management at 39 weeks of gestation. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01990612.

Indexed as

Labor, InducedObstetric Labor ComplicationsAdultDecision Support TechniquesFemaleGestational AgeHumansNatural ChildbirthParityPregnancyPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID32925634
PMCPMC7899015
OpenAlexW3085091261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.