Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32925620›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2020

Improved Outcomes With an Enhanced Recovery Approach to Cesarean Delivery.

Luciana Mullman, Patrick Hilden, Jan Goral, Nnamdi Gwacham, Caitlin Tauro, Kristen Spinola, Kim Rosales, Sheila Collier, Lynice Holmes, Janice Maccione and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04816279 (Clinical Audit on the Quality of Care of Elective Caesarean Section), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04816279 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Audit on the Quality of Care of Elective Caesarean Section

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled120ConditionsCesarean Section, Quality Of Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Luciana MullmanDepartments of Clinical Excellence, Biostatistics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nursing, Anesthesia, Medicine, and CIS Informatics, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, RWJBarnabas Health, Livingston, New Jersey.
Patrick Hilden
Jan Goral
Nnamdi Gwacham
Caitlin Tauro
Kristen Spinola
Kim Rosales
Sheila Collier
Lynice Holmes
Janice Maccione
Richard Pitera
Richard Miller
Paul Yodice
Twitter (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the results of a quality-improvement study that implemented an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for cesarean delivery.

methodsA pre-post design was used to assess changes in opioid use, length of stay, and costs among all patients undergoing cesarean delivery before and after implementation of an evidence-based ERAS pathway for the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative management of patients beginning December 2018.

resultsA total of 3,679 cesarean deliveries (scheduled and emergent) were included from January 1, 2018, through August 31, 2019, of which 2,171 occurred before implementation on December 17, 2018, and 1,508 occurred postimplementation. Eighty-four percent of patients received opioids as inpatients after cesarean delivery during the preimplementation period, as compared with 24% in the postimplementation period (odds ratio [OR] 16.8, 95% CI 14.3-19.9). Among patients who required any opioids, the total morphine milligram equivalents also significantly decreased (median 56.5 vs 15.0, mean relative change 0.32, 95% CI 0.28-0.35). Compared with the preimplementation period, those in the postimplementation period had a shorter postcesarean length of stay (3.2 vs 2.7 days, mean relative change 0.82, 95% CI 0.80-0.83, median 3 days in both periods), lower median direct costs by $349 (mean relative change 0.93, 95% CI 0.91-0.95), and no change in the 30-day readmission rate (1.4% vs 1.7%, OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.49-1.41).

conclusionAn ERAS approach for the cesarean delivery population is associated with improved outcomes including decreases in opioid use, length of stay, and costs.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryPostoperative CareAdultAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidCosts and Cost AnalysisFemaleHumansLength of StayOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient ReadmissionPostoperative PainPregnancyQuality ImprovementAnalgesicsAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID32925620
PMCPMC7505153
OpenAlexW3085766097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.