Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32925566›Full record

ArticlePediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies2020

The Impact of the Novel Coronavirus on Brazilian PICUs.

Orlei Ribeiro de Araujo, Carlos Gustavo de Almeida, Fernanda Lima-Setta, Arnaldo Prata-Barbosa, José Colleti Junior, Brazilian Research Network in Pediatric Intensive Care (BRnet-PIC)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluation of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome surveillance caused by respiratory viruses in a pediatric unit, 2013 to 2019.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. COVID-19-Associated Acute Brain Dysfunction Related to Sepsis.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Orlei Ribeiro de AraujoGRAACC, Instituto de Oncologia Pediátrica, UNIFESP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos Gustavo de AlmeidaHospital Assunção, Rede D'Or São Luiz, São Bernardo do Campo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernanda Lima-SettaInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Arnaldo Prata-BarbosaInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
José Colleti JuniorDepartment of Pediatrics, Hospital Assunção, Rede D'Or São Luiz, São Bernardo do Campo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Brazilian Research Network in Pediatric Intensive Care (BRnet-PIC)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo study the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, considering the physical distancing and schools closing, on the characteristics of admission and epidemiology on Brazilian PICUs.

designObservational, multicenter, time series analysis, of electronic medical records from 15 PICU in Brazil. Data consisted of all March, April, and May PICU admissions from 2017 to 2020.

settingFifteen private PICUs in Brazil. PATIENTS: Pediatric patients admitted to the PICU from March to May since 2017.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsThe period from March 11, 2020, to March 17, 2020, was considered the "intervention point" studied, corresponding to the suspension of school activities and the beginning of physical distancing in Brazil. During the pandemic period studied, there were 28 cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (one death). The mean age was higher (p = 0.000), the length of stay was shorter (p = 0.000), but mortality rates were similar among the periods (p = 0.36). The model estimated a reduction of 1,483 PICU admissions from March 2020 to May 2020. At the end of May, there was an estimated drop of -146.6 bronchiolitis admissions (95% CI, -242.8 to -50.3; p = 0.016); -71 asthma admissions (95% CI, -93.6 to -48.63; p = 0.000); and -59 community-acquired pneumonia admissions (95% CI, -74.7 to -43.3; p = 0.000) per period. The model showed no effect of the "intervention" (physical distancing) on hospitalization rates for epilepsy, diarrhea, sepsis, bacterial meningitis, or surgery when analyzed individually. When assessed together, the model estimated a reduction of 73.6 admissions (95% IC, -132 to -15.2; p = 0.43).

conclusionsThe coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic strongly affected Brazilian PICUs, reducing admissions, length of stay, and the epidemiological profile. The measures to oppose the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic may have prevented thousands of PICU hospitalizations across the country.

Indexed as

BrazilChildChild, PreschoolCOVID-19FemaleHospitalizationHumansInfantIntensive Care Units, PediatricLength of StayMalePandemicsPatient AdmissionPhysical DistancingSARS-CoV-2Schools

Identifiers

PMID32925566
PMCPMC7508037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.